rss
Ann Rheum Dis 2000;59:44-47 doi:10.1136/ard.59.1.44
  • Extended report

Diagnostic values of clinical diagnostic tests in subacromial impingement syndrome

  1. Mustafa Çalışa,
  2. Kenan Akgüna,
  3. Murat Birtaneb,
  4. Ilhan Karacanc,
  5. Havva Çalışa,
  6. Fikret Tüzüna
  1. aDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine Istanbul, Turkey, bDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Trakya University, Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey, cAksaray Vatan Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  1. Dr M Birtane, Kocasinan Mah 6 Sok, Akan 3 Apt no 3, Daire 4, Edirne, Turkey
  • Accepted 10 August 1999

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is a frequent cause of shoulder pain. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic values of clinical diagnostic tests, in patients with SIS.

METHODS 72 female, 48 male patients with shoulder pain were included in the study. Five had bilateral shoulder pain, so 125 painful shoulders were evaluated. Details were recorded about the patients' ages and sexes, as well as characteristics of pain and related problems. Detailed physical examination and routine laboratory tests were performed. Conventional radiography and subsequent magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder region of all patients were performed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the results of subacromial injection test, a reference standard test for SIS. Test positive patients constituted SIS group and test negative patients the non-SIS group. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of some clinical diagnostic tests such as Neer, Hawkins, horizontal adduction, painful arc, drop arm, Yergason and Speed tests for SIS were determined by using 2 × 2 table.

RESULTS The most sensitive diagnostic tests were found to be Hawkins test (92.1%), Neer test (88.7%) and horizontal adduction test (82.0%). Tests with highest specificity were drop arm test (97.2%), Yergason test (86.1%) and painful arc test (80.5%) consecutively.

CONCLUSION The highly sensitive tests seem to have low specificity values and the highly specific ones to have low sensitivity values. Although this finding suggests that these diagnostic tests are insufficient for certain diagnosis, it is suggested they play an important part in clinical evaluation.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content


    Free trial
    Individuals may register for a free 60 day online trial to all content.

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.