Article Text


Immunoglobulin allotype gene polymorphisms in systemic sclerosis: interactive effect of MHC class II and KM genes on anticentromere antibody production
  1. Hideto Kamedaa,
  2. Janardan P Pandeyb,
  3. Junichi Kaburakia,
  4. Hidetoshi Inokoc,
  5. Masataka Kuwanaa
  1. aDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, bDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA, cDivision of Molecular Life Science, Department of Genetic Information, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
  1. Dr M Kuwana, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160–8582, Japan.


OBJECTIVE To examine potential interactions between immunoglobulin (Ig)allotype gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to systemic sclerosis (SSc) as well as serological expression in SSc patients.

METHODS IgG heavy chain allotypes G1M(f, z), G2M(n+, n-), G3M(b, g) and Ig light chain allotype KM(1, (1, 2), 3) were genotyped in 105 Japanese SSc patients and 47 race matched normal controls using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based methods. Associations of each Ig allotype with SSc related antinuclear antibodies were examined in combination with or without MHC class II alleles.

RESULTS GM/KM genotypic and allelic frequencies were similar in SSc patients and in normal controls. Frequencies of G1M(f) and G2M(n+) were significantly decreased in anticentromere antibody (ACA) positive SSc patients compared with ACA negative SSc patients (p = 0.04 and 0.02, respectively). Conversely, the presence of DQB1*0501 and KM(1, 2) significantly increased the risk of ACA positivity.

CONCLUSION Ig allotype gene polymorphisms were not associated with susceptibility to SSc. Instead, the results suggested that MHC class II and KM genes are associated with autoimmune responses by interactively promoting the production of ACA.

  • autoantibody
  • immunoglobulin allotype
  • major histocompatibility complex
  • scleroderma

Statistics from

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a disease characterised by fibrosis of the dermis and internal organs, microvascular injury, and the presence of circulating antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) to various nuclear proteins such as DNA topoisomerase I (topo I) and centromere/ kinetochore.1 The aetiology of SSc remains unclear, but genetic factors are believed to influence its development, based on epidemiological studies showing familial clustering of SSc and SSc related disorders including Raynaud’s phenomenon.2Genes located within the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) locus have been extensively analysed as candidate genes for susceptibility to SSc, but the findings have suggested that MHC class II genes were associated less with SSc in itself but were instead associated with the expression of SSc related ANAs.3 We have found MHC class II gene associations with serum SSc related ANAs in Japanese, including anti-topo I antibody with DRB1*15024 and anticentromere antibody (ACA) with DQB1*0501.5 Moreover, anti-U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (U1snRNP) antibodies, primarily detected in SSc patients with overlap features of lupus and/or myositis, were associated with DQB1*0302 in Japanese patients with connective tissue disease.6

The immune response genes, which control immune responses to specific antigens, include MHC genes and genes coding for the immunoglobulin (Ig) allotypic markers, the latter are located in the constant regions of Ig heavy and light chains.7 Previous studies have shown associations between Ig allotypic phenotypes and susceptibility to several autoimmune diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus,8 myasthenia gravis,9 and Graves’ disease.10 11 The presence of specific ANAs in patients with autoimmune diseases was also shown to be associated with Ig allotypes.12 13 Interactive effects of MHC antigens and Ig allotypes on the production of antibodies directed against foreign and self antigens have been demonstrated.14 15However, influences of Ig allotypes on serological expression in SSc patients are largely undefined.

Recently, gene organisation of the Ig loci has been extensively analysed and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based molecular typing methods for Ig allotypic markers have been established.16-19 In this study, therefore, we identified Ig allotype gene polymorphisms in Japanese patients with SSc and examined for associations of these markers with ANA status in SSc patients. Interactive effects of the two independent immune response genes, MHC class II and Ig allotypes, on SSc related ANA responses were also investigated.



We studied 105 unrelated Japanese SSc patients, all of whom satisfied the American College of Rheumatology (ACR; formerly the American Rheumatism Association) preliminary classification criteria of SSc.20 Ninety five SSc patients in this study had been analysed in our previous studies that examined for associations between MHC class II alleles and SSc related ANAs.4-6 All SSc patients had been observed regularly by clinical staff of the Division of Rheumatology, Keio University Hospital for more than three years or had died of causes related to SSc within three years of diagnosis. The mean time between their first visit and the latest follow up evaluation was 8.9 years (range 0.8–24 years). Forty seven unrelated healthy Japanese volunteers living in Tokyo metropolitan area were selected as race matched normal controls.


Serum samples, obtained from SSc patients at first visit, were stored at −20°C. Three major SSc related ANAs were identified as described previously; anti-topo I and anti-U1snRNP antibodies by double immunodiffusion using rabbit thymus extract as an antigen source and immunoprecipitation assays using 35S-labelled HeLa cell extracts; and ACA by indirect immunofluorescence on HeLa cell chromosomal spreads.21


The DRB1, DQB1, and DPB1 genes were typed using restriction fragment length polymorphisms of PCR amplified genomic DNA as described previously.22 The numbers of alleles defined by this method are 52 (DRB1), 17 (DQB1), and 19 (DPB1).


Genotyping of Ig heavy chain (GM) and light chain (KM) allotypes was carried out as described previously.16-19 GM/KM allotype polymorphisms analysed in this study are summarised in table1. Briefly, the G1M, G2M, G3M, and KM genes corresponding to the CH domains including known polymorphisms were amplified using subclass specific primers. Nucleic acid differences were discriminated by restriction enzyme digestion of PCR amplified products (PCR-RFLP; G2M, G3M, and KM) or hybridisation of PCR amplified products with sequence specific oligonucleotide probes (PCR-SSO; G1M).

Table 1

GM/KM allotype gene polymorphisms analysed in this study


Differences in frequencies were analysed by Fisher’s two tailed exact tests. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were also calculated.

To analyse interactive effects of MHC class II alleles and GM/KM allotypes on SSc related ANA responses, complex interactions for contingency tables were investigated by fitting log-linear models according to the hierarchial principle.15 23 Interaction between a particular combination of the MHC class II allele and the GM/KM allotype on the production of certain SSc related ANA was considered to be present when all of the following findings was satisfied: (a) risk for developing the SSc related ANA response affected by non-additive effects of two genetic markers (MHC class II alleles and GM/KM allotypes) was significant by appropriate G2 likelihood ratio statistic; (b) when individuals with neither risk were taken as a reference, frequency of individuals possessing both genetic markers in the ANA positive patients was significantly increased compared with those in the ANA negative patients and normal controls, using pairwise comparisons by Fisher’s exact tests; and (c) frequency of individuals possessing a single genetic marker in the ANA positive patients was not significantly increased compared with those in the ANA negative patients and normal controls.



Genotypic and allelic frequencies of GM/KM allotypes including G1M(f, z), G2M(n+, n-), G3M(b, g), and KM(1, (1,2), 3) were compared between 105 SSc patients and 47 normal controls (table 2). G3M(b, g) could not be typed in eight SSc patients and in six normal controls because of the failure to obtain PCR amplified products with an appropriate molecular size. G1M(z) and G2M(n-) were detected in nearly all SSc patients and normal controls, whereas KM(1) was detected in none of our subjects. G1M(f), G2M(n+), and G3M(b) tended to be frequently detected in SSc patients compared with normal controls, but these differences did not reach statistical significance.

Table 2

Genotypic and allelic frequencies of GM/KM allotypes in SSc patients and normal controls


Serum anti-topo I, anti-U1snRNP, ACA were detected in 37 (35%), 35 (33%), and 23 (22%) of 105 SSc patients, respectively. Seven patients had both anti-topo I and anti-U1snRNP antibodies, but none of ACA positive patients had coexistent anti-topo I or anti-U1snRNP antibody. Frequency of each GM/KM allele was compared according to the presence or absence of these three major SSc related ANAs (table 3). We could not find any significant difference in distribution of GM/KM alleles between anti-topo I-positive and negative SSc nor between anti-U1snRNP positive and negative SSc. In contrast, G1M(f) was found in only one ACA positive SSc patient (4%) compared with 21 (26%) ACA negative patients (p = 0.04, OR = 0.13). Similarly, G2M(n+) was significantly less frequently detected in ACA positive SSc patients compared with ACA negative SSc patients (p = 0.02, OR = 0.12). Frequency of G3M(b), which is in linkage disequilibrium with G1M(f) and G2M(n+) in Japanese,24 25 was marginally decreased in ACA positive compared with negative SSc patients. As a result, SSc patients with ACA were homogeneous in terms of the GM phenotype, as 21 (91%) of 23 ACA positive patients had the G1M(z)/G2M(n-)/G3M(g) phenotype, which was found in 52 (63%) of 82 ACA negative SSc patients (p = 0.01, OR = 6.1, 95%CI 1.5 to 24.2). These results indicated that G1M(f) and G2M(n+) were negatively associated with ACA in SSc patients. However, frequencies of G1M(f), G2M(n+), and G3M(b) were not different between ACA positive SSc patients compared with normal controls, and G1M(f) and G3M(b) were significantly more frequently detected in ACA negative SSc patients compared with normal controls (p = 0.04, OR = 2.9, 95%CI 1.0 to 8.1 in both comparisons). Therefore, it is also possible that G1M(f) and G3M(b) were associated with ACA negative SSc.

Table 3

Allele frequency (%) of GM/KM allotypes in SSc patients according to the presence or absence of SSc related ANAs


The strongest associations between three major SSc related ANAs (anti-topo I, anti-U1snRNP, and ACA) and MHC class II alleles found were; DRB1*1502 detected in 26 (70%) anti-topo I positive SSc compared with 20 (29%) anti-topo I negative SSc and 13 (28%) normal controls (p = 0.0001 and 0.0002, respectively); DQB1*0302 detected in 14 (40%) anti-U1snRNP positive SSc compared with 14 (20%) anti-U1snRNP negative SSc and five (11%) normal controls (p = 0.03 and 0.003, respectively); and DQB1*0501 detected in nine (39%) ACA positive SSc compared with nine (11%) ACA negative SSc and five (13%) normal controls (p = 0.004 and 0.009, respectively). We further examined possible interactive effects of MHC class II alleles and Ig allotypes on the production of SSc related ANAs. Table 4 shows frequencies of all combinations of the presence or absence of DQB1*0501 and KM(1, 2) in ACA positive SSc, ACA negative SSc, and normal controls. Analysis by fitting log-linear models showed the presence of three way interactions among DQB1*0501, KM(1, 2), and ACA (G2 = 21.2, p = 0.002). When individuals with none of the three factors were taken as a reference, relative risk estimated by odds ratios for DQB1*0501/KM(1, 2) carriers to develop ACA response was 8.0 in both comparisons. In contrast, frequencies of individuals having either DQB1*0501 or KM(1, 2) alone were not increased in ACA positive SSc compared with ACA negative SSc and in normal controls, indicating that the significance in three way interactions was contributed by the combination of both DQB1*0501 and KM(1, 2), but not by DQB1*0501 or KM(1, 2) alone. It was noted that individuals having KM(1, 2) but not having DQB1*0501 were significantly less frequently found in ACA positive SSc compared with ACA negative SSc patients (p = 0.04). Similar analyses in combinations of the presence or absence of the SSc related ANA associated MHC class II alleles (DRB1*1502 in anti-topo I, DQB1*0302 in anti-U1snRNP, and DQB1*0501 in ACA) and GM/KM allotypes failed to observe an additional interactive effect on the ANA response (data not shown).

Table 4

Combination of DQB1*0501 and KM(1, 2) in ACA positive and negative SSc patients and normal controls


This is the first report analysing Ig allotype gene polymorphisms in SSc patients. Our results confirm the results of previous studies using serological typing methods, which described that GM/KM phenotypes were not associated with SSc in itself.13 26-28 Instead, our results showed that the production of ACA, one of major SSc related autoantibodies, was influenced by Ig allotype gene polymorphisms, based on the following findings: (a) G1M(f) and G2M(n+) were negatively associated with the presence of ACA in SSc patients; and (b) DQB1*0501 and KM (1,2) synergically promoted the production of ACA. Taken together, this study strongly suggests that Ig allotypes are not related to disease expression in SSc patients, but are associated with the induction of certain SSc related ANA response.

Previously reported associations between ANA specificities and Ig allotypes included the associations of anti-La/SS-B antibody and anti-double stranded-DNA antibody responses with serologically determined KM(1), which corresponds to KM(1) and KM(1, 2) together by our typing methods.12 13 One of the authors (JPP) previously showed the lack of associations between serologically determined GM/KM phenotypes and ACA.26 The reasons for this discordant result are unclear; possible explanations include patient selection methods and ethnic backgrounds of SSc patients studied. ACA positive patients in this study were selected based on the ACR classification criteria of SSc, whereas ACA positive patients in the previous study contained patients with milder disease manifestations who did not satisfy the ACR criteria but had some components of calcinosis, Raynaud’s phenomenon, oesophageal dysmotility, sclerodactyly, and telangiectasia (CREST syndrome). Racial difference could be another explanation for this inconsistent result, as SSc patients in this study were all Japanese living in a small geographical area while North American white patients were examined in the previous study. It has been shown that distribution of SSc related ANAs and MHC class II alleles associated with SSc related ANAs were distinctly different among racial groups.3 29 In addition, allelic distribution of GM/KM allotypes are also shown to be variable among people with various ethnic origins.24 30

Our results suggest that the coincidence of two independent genetic markers, DQB1*0501 and KM(1, 2), increases the risk of an ACA autoimmune response. The combined effects of HLA and GM/KM phenotypes have been observed in the antibody response to a bacterial antigen14 and in the development of several autoimmune diseases.31 32 Genth et al reported that the coexistence of DR4 and Gm(1,3;5,21) was related to anti-U1snRNP antibody production in 35 patients with connective tissue disease (only six patients were diagnosed as having SSc).15 In the present study, interactive effects between DQB1*0302 and GM/KM allotypes were not found in the production of anti-U1snRNP antibody. Furthermore, we also failed to observe interactive effects on anti-U1snRNP antibody formation with other MHC class II markers, including all combined DR4 specificity (DRB1*0401-*0413) and each DR4 associated DRB1 allele (data not shown). This paradoxical finding could be because of racial differences between a white population and Japanese, because we found that DR4, which was shown to be associated with anti-U1snRNP antibody in the Genth report, was not associated with anti-U1snRNP antibody in Japanese.6

Possible mechanisms by which polymorphisms located in the constant regions of Igs influence ANA responses include linkage disequilibrium between certain Ig allotypic genes and pathogenic genes or variable regions of Igs, and influence on conformation (affinity) of the antigen binding site of autoantibodies. Interactive effects of MHC class II and KM genes on ACA production suggest another possibility that Ig allotypes affect uptake of autoantigens via surface Ig, and processing and presentation of autoantigens by B cells. Recently, one of us (MK) and others demonstrated the requirement of MHC class II restricted T and B cell collaboration for autoantibody production in SSc patients33 and in lupus prone mice.34 It has been proposed that autoantibody production is a result of the generation of cross reactive B cells, initially primed by foreign protein serving as a molecular mimic, that then bind, process, and present self protein.35 The cross reactive B cells can subsequently prime autoreactive T cells, as B cells have ability to concentrate specific antigen via surface Ig and present small quantities of determinants to T cells in the context of MHC class II molecules. Therefore, it is possible that differences in constant region of surface Ig affect the antigen processing/presenting pathway and induce the expression of self determinants that fit in the peptide binding groove of susceptible MHC class II molecules.

In summary, Ig allotype gene polymorphisms were not associated with susceptibility to SSc, but our results strongly suggest that MHC class II and KM genes, two independent immune response genes, interactively promote the production of ACA.


We thank Dr Carwile LeRoy for critical reading of this manuscript. This work was supported by the Scleroderma Grant for Intractable Disease from the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare and the US Department of Energy grant (DE-FC02–98CH10902).


View Abstract

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.