Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 May 2008

Ann Rheum Dis. Published Online First: 17 December 2007. doi:10.1136/ard.2007.082115
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism.

Extended Report

A double-blind placebo controlled trial of etanercept in patients with giant cell arteritis and corticosteroid side effects

Victor M Martinez Taboada 1, Vicente Rodríguez-Valverde 2*, Luis Carreño 3, Javier Lopez-Longo 3, Manuel Figueroa 4, Joaquín Belzunegui 4, Emilio Martín-Mola 5 and Gema Bonilla 5

1 Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla. Facultad de Medicina. Universidad de Cantabria, Spain
2 Facultad de Medicina. Universidad de Cantabria, Spain
3 Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Spain
4 Hospital de Donosti, Spain
5 Hospital Universitario La Paz, Spain

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rodriguv{at}unican.es.

Accepted 2 December 2007


Abstract

Objective: Open label studies have suggested that TNF antagonists led to sustained improvement and corticosteroid sparing effect in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA). To confirm these observations, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial with etanercept in patients with biopsy-proven GCA with side-effects secondary to corticosteroids.

Methods: We randomly assigned GCA patients to receive etanercept (n=8) or placebo (n=9) during 1 year together with corticosteroids that were reduced according to a predefined schedule. The primary outcome was the ability to withdraw the corticosteroid therapy and controlling the disease activity at 12 months.

Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups although patients in the etanercept group showed higher levels of basal glycemia (p=0.02) and a higher ESR (p=0.01). After 12 months, 50% of the patients in the etanercept group and 22.2% in the placebo group were able to control the disease without corticosteroid therapy (p=NS). Patients in the etanercept group had a significant lower dose of accumulated prednisone during the first year of treatment (p=0.03). There were no differences in the number and type of adverse events.

Conclusion: The limited number of patients included in this study does not allow to draw definitive conclusions. Etanercept therapy was well tolerated in this aged population. The therapeutic role of etanercept in GCA patients should be evaluated in studies with a larger number of patients.

Keywords: corticosteroids, etanercept, giant cell arteritis, side effects


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Do we need treatment with tumour necrosis factor blockers for giant cell arteritis?
Carlo Salvarani, Nicolò Pipitone, Luigi Boiardi, and Gene G Hunder
Ann Rheum Dis 2008 67: 577-579. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Salvarani, C., Pipitone, N., Boiardi, L., Hunder, G. G (2008). Do we need treatment with tumour necrosis factor blockers for giant cell arteritis?. Ann Rheum Dis 67: 577-579 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest Rheumatology Jobs

Rheumatology Jobs