Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 April 2008

Ann Rheum Dis. Published Online First: 29 August 2007. doi:10.1136/ard.2007.074724
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism.

Extended Report

Proposal of a linear definition of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) and comparison with the 2-step and 10-step definitions

Désirée van der Heijde 1*, Robert Landewé 2 and Ernst Feldtkeller 3

1 Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands
2 University of Maastricht, Netherlands
3 Ankylosing Spondylitis International Federation, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: d.vanderheijde{at}kpnplanet.nl.

Accepted 1 August 2007


Abstract

Background: The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), characterizes the spinal mobility of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Two versions have been published using categorical scores with either scores 0-2 for each of the five assessments, or scores 0–10. For metric purposes, we recently defined a BASMI version with linear score definitions.

Aim: to evaluate agreement between three BASMI definitions and to test sensitivity-to-change.

Patients and methods: The performance of the BASMI2 (based on the 2-step function), BASMI10 (based on the 10-step function), and BASMIlin (based on the linear function), are compared in 598 status assessments and 222 follow-up assessments with a 24 week interval after an intervention with either placebo or a TNF-blocker from various cohorts of patients with AS. Descriptive statistics and Bland & Altman plots were applied to compare the pair wise agreement of the three definitions. To assess sensitivity to change, Guyatt’s effect size using change data from the placebo and actively treated patients were used.

Results: Bland & Altman analysis showed that the differences between BASMI2 scores and scores obtained by either of the two other definitions were highly dependent on the magnitude of the measurement. Guyatt’s effect sizes were 0.66 for the BASMI2, 0.95 for the BASMI10, and 1.04 for the BASMIlin, respectively, demonstrating best sensitivity to change for the newly developed BASMIlin.

Conclusions: The BAMSI10 and BASMIlin have clear metric advantages as compared to BASMI2 among which its feasibility in computer evaluations and superior sensitivity to change. The BASMI10 and BASMI2 are not interchangeable.

Keywords: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index, ankylosing spondylitis, outcome assessment, spinal mobility, validation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Sieper, J, Rudwaleit, M, Baraliakos, X, Brandt, J, Braun, J, Burgos-Vargas, R, Dougados, M, Hermann, K-G, Landewe, R, Maksymowych, W, van der Heijde, D (2009). The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 68: ii1-ii44 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest Rheumatology Jobs

Rheumatology Jobs