Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 November 2007

Ann Rheum Dis. Published Online First: 1 May 2007. doi:10.1136/ard.2007.069765
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism.

Extended Report

Changes in priorities for improvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis during one year of anti-TNF treatment

Peter M ten Klooster 1*, Martine M Veehof 1, Erik Taal 1, Piet LCM van Riel 2 and Mart AFJ van de Laar 3

1 University of Twente, Netherlands
2 University Medical Center Nijmegen, Netherlands
3 Medisch Spectrum Twente, Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: p.m.tenklooster{at}utwente.nl.

Accepted 19 April 2007


Abstract

Objectives: To examine priorities for health status improvement in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during anti-TNF treatment.

Methods: Data were used from 173 RA patients starting with TNF-blocking agents. Outcome measures included assessment of health status with the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 (AIMS2) at baseline and after 3 and 12 months. The AIMS2 contains a priority list where patients are asked to select 3 out of 12 areas of health where they would most like to see improvement.

Results: After one year of treatment, 10 out of 12 areas of health on the AIMS2 were significantly improved. The most frequently selected priorities for improvement at baseline were pain (88%), hand and finger function (57%), walking and bending (42%), mobility (33%), and work (29%). At a group level, this priority ranking remained largely unchanged during treatment. After adjustment for multiple comparisons, only pain was selected significantly less frequently at 3 and 12 months (71% at both assessments). Within individual patients, however, priorities frequently changed. Changes in the priority of pain were related to the achieved level of patient-perceived pain and disease activity.

Conclusions: This study shows that, at the group level, patients’ priorities for improvement are fairly stable during 12 months of anti-TNF therapy, despite major improvements in health status. Although pain reduction becomes somewhat less important, it remains the most frequently selected priority. Individual patient priorities are not stable over the course of treatment and appear to be associated with differences in disease state.

Keywords: Health status, Pain, Patient priorities, Rheumatoid arthritis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Anis, A., Zhang, W., Emery, P., Sun, H., Singh, A., Freundlich, B., Sato, R. (2009). The effect of etanercept on work productivity in patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis: results from the COMET study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 48: 1283-1289 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest Rheumatology Jobs

Rheumatology Jobs