Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 May 2007

Ann Rheum Dis. Published Online First: 11 December 2006. doi:10.1136/ard.2006.063164
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism.

Extended Report

Reporting of radiographic methods in randomized controlled trials assessing structural outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis

Gabriel Baron 1*, Isabelle Boutron 1, Bruno Giraudeau 2 and Philippe Ravaud 1

1 Departement d’Epidemiologie - Hopital Bichat, France
2 Centre d'Investigation Clinique Tours, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gabriel.baron{at}bch.aphp.fr.

Accepted 2 December 2006


Abstract

Objective: Because an increasing number of clinical trials evaluating disease modifying anti- rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) emphasize radiographic outcomes as a primary outcome, using a reproducible radiographic measure should be placed at a premium. We aimed to evaluate the reporting of radiographic methods in randomized trials assessing radiographic outcomes in RA.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE for randomized controlled trials assessing radiographic outcomes published between January 1994 and December 2005 in general medical and specialty journals with a high impact factor. One reader extracted data (radiographic acquisition, assessment and reproducibility) using a standardized form.

Results: A total of 46 reports were included in the analysis. The mean (SD) methodological quality scores on the Jadad scale (range 0-5) and the Delphi list (0-9) were 2.9 (1.2) and 6.4 (1.3), respectively. Use of a standardized procedure for the acquisition of the radiographs was reported in 2 articles (4.3%). Two reports (4.3%) indicated that the quality of the radiographs was evaluated. In 65.2% of the reports, 2 or more radiographic scores were used. Reporting of radiographic assessment was well detailed for number of readers (91.3%), information on readers (71.7%), blinding (91.4%) and how films were viewed (74.0%). The reproducibility of the reading was reported in 39.1% of the articles.

Conclusion: Our results highlight that the reporting of results of randomized controlled trials of radiographic outcomes in RA shows great variability in radiographic scores used and that reporting of radiographic methods could be improved upon, especially the acquisition procedure and the reproducibility of the reading.

Keywords: radiographic acquisition, radiographic assessment, randomized controlled trials, reproducibility, rheumatoid arthritis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Ellegaard, K., Torp-Pedersen, S., Henriksen, M., Lund, H., Danneskiold-Samsoe, B., Bliddal, H. (2009). Influence of recent exercise and skin temperature on ultrasound Doppler measurements in patients with rheumatoid arthritis--an intervention study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 48: 1520-1523 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest Rheumatology Jobs

Rheumatology Jobs