Ann Rheum Dis. Published Online First: 27 March 2007. doi:10.1136/ard.2006.054742
Extended Report |
Do rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical practice benefit from switching from infliximab to a second tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor?
1 Hvidovre Hospital, Denmark
2 The Danish Database for Biological Therapies in Rheumatology (Danbio), Denmark
3 Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev, Denmark
4 University Hospital at Aarhus, Denmark
5 Rheumatism Hospital, Gråsten, Denmark
6 Copenhagen University Hospital at Frederiksberg, Denmark
7 Sydvestjysk Sygehus in Esbjerg, Denmark
8 University Hospital at Odense, Denmark
9 Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
10 University Hosptial in Glostrup, Denmark
11 University Hospital at Gentofte, Denmark
12 University Hospital of Rigshospitalet, Denmark
13 Hørsholm Hospital, Denmark
14 Institute for Rational Pharmacotherapy, Danish Medicines Agency, Denmark
15 University Hospital at Hvidovre, Denmark
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: merete.hetland{at}dadlnet.dk.
Accepted 10 March 2007
Abstract
Objective:In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients to investigate the efficacy of switching to a second biological drug.
Methods:Since 2000, Danish RA patients (n=1021) receiving biological therapy have been registered in the nationwide DANBIO database. The 1st and 2nd treatment series of patients, who switched therapy before 2005 (n=235), were analysed for reasons for switching, DAS28 score, DAS28 improvement, EULAR response and drug survival. Most patients switched from infliximab to etanercept or adalimumab.
Results:Median survivals for switchers' 1st /2nd treatment were 37/92 weeks (All patients 1st treatment: 119 weeks). Reasons for switching were lack of efficacy (LOE) (109 patients), adverse events (AE) (72), other reasons (54). If patients experienced AE to the 1st drug, 15% had AE to the 2nd. Median DAS28 improvements in 1st /2nd treatment at 3 months were: LOE switchers: 1.1/1.6; AE switchers: 1.5/0.8. In LOE switchers, a good/moderate EULAR response was more prevalent during the 2nd treatment course than during the 1st (63% vs. 54%, p=0.02). AE switchers achieved similar EULAR responses to both treatments (59% vs. 50%, p=0.38).
ConclusionLOE switchers had better clinical response to the 2nd treatment. AE switchers responded equally well to both treatments with a low risk of discontinuing the 2nd drug due to AE. Drug survival of the switchers 2nd biological therapy was higher than of the 1st, but lower than that of non-switchers. No difference between various sequences of drugs were found. Danish post-marketing data thus support that RA patients may benefit from switching biological therapy.
Keywords: TNF alpha inhibitors, drug efficacy, observational study, rheumatoid arthritis, second biological treatment
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
BLOM, M., KIEVIT, W., FRANSEN, J., KUPER, I. H., den BROEDER, A. A., De GENDT, C. M.A., JANSEN, T. L., BRUS, H. L.M., van de LAAR, M. A.F.J., van RIEL, P. L.C.M.
(2009). The Reason for Discontinuation of the First Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Blocking Agent Does Not Influence the Effect of a Second TNF Blocking Agent in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. The Journal of Rheumatology
36: 2171-2177
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Zink, A, Askling, J, Dixon, W G, Klareskog, L, Silman, A J, Symmons, D P M
(2009). European biologicals registers: methodology, selected results and perspectives. Ann Rheum Dis
68: 1240-1246
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Hetland, M L, Lindegaard, H M, Hansen, A, Podenphant, J, Unkerskov, J, Ringsdal, V S, Ostergaard, M, Tarp, U
(2008). Do changes in prescription practice in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biological agents affect treatment response and adherence to therapy? Results from the nationwide Danish DANBIO Registry. Ann Rheum Dis
67: 1023-1026
[Abstract] [Full Text]
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- Response to Hjardem Elisabeth, et al article Ann Rheum Dis 2007; 66: 1184-1189
- Paul Emery, et al.
- Ann Rheum Dis Online, 11 Sep 2007 [Full text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
stergaard 2,