Ann Rheum Dis. Published Online First: 8 December 2005. doi:10.1136/ard.2005.045781
Extended Report |
A randomized, controlled trial of the reciprocating syringe in arthrocentesis
1 University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, United States
2 University of New Mexico, United States
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hdraeger31{at}aol.com.
Accepted 27 November 2005
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of arthrocentesis with the new highly controllable, one- handed reciprocating procedure syringe compared to a conventional syringe.
Methods: 100 arthrocentesis procedures were randomized between the reciprocating syringe and the conventional syringe. Outcome measures included patient pain, procedure duration, operator satisfaction, synovial fluid volume, cell counts, and complications.
Results: 50 arthrocentesis procedures with the conventional syringe resulted in a mean procedure time of 3.39± 1.88 minutes, a mean VAPS (patient pain) score of 5.35 ± 3.15, and a mean VASS (operator satisfaction) score of 4.88± 1.92. 30/50 subjects experienced moderate to severe pain (VAPS score 5 or greater) during arthrocentesis. In contrast, the reciprocating syringe resulted in a reduced procedure time of 1.94± 1.14 minutes (p<0.001), a reduced VAPS (patient pain) score of 2.54± 1.60 (p<0.001), and an increased VASS (operator satisfaction) score of 8.91± 0.79 (p<0.001). Only 5/50 of subjects experienced moderate to severe pain with the reciprocating syringe. Synovial cell counts were similar between the two syringes (p > 0.05), but there was a trend toward greater volume (greater synovial fluid yield) and fewer red blood cells with the reciprocating syringe.
Conclusions: Arthrocentesis with a conventional syringe results in moderate to severe pain in 60% of subjects. The reciprocating syringe prevents significant pain, reduces procedure time, and improves physician performance of arthrocentesis. The reciprocating syringe is superior to the conventional syringe in arthrocentesis.
Keywords: Arthrocentesis, joint, procedure, reciprocating, syringe
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Sibbitt, R. R., Palmer, D. J., Sibbitt, W. L. Jr
(2008). Integration of Patient Safety Technologies Into Sclerotherapy for Varicose Veins. VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG
42: 446-455
[Abstract]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
