Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 February 2006

Ann Rheum Dis. Published Online First: 13 July 2005. doi:10.1136/ard.2004.032565
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism.

Extended Report

Markov model into the cost-utility over five years of etanercept and infliximab compared to usual care in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis

Annelies Boonen 1*, Désirée van der Heijde 1, Johannes Severens 2, Arjo Boendermaker 2, Robert Landewé 1, Jürgen Braun 3, Jan Brandt 3, Joachim Sieper 4 and Sjef van der Linden 1

1 University Hospital Maastricht, Netherlands
2 University Maastricht, Netherlands
3 Rheumatology Medical Center Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany
4 Free University Berlin, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: aboo{at}sint.azm.nl.

Accepted 23 June 2005


Abstract

Objective: To estimate the incremental cost- utility of etanercept and infliximab compared with usual care in active ankylosing spondylitis.

Methods: A Markov model over five years with cycle times of three months was computed. Patients included had all active disease, defined as Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) ³ 4 and could reach low disease activity defined as BASDAI<4. Non-response to TNF-a inhibitors was always followed by stopping treatment. Response to TNF-a inhibitors could be followed at any time by (1) relapse to BASDAI ³ 4 leading to treatment stop or (2) toxicity leading to treatment stop in case of major toxicity. Probabilities for efficacy, relapse and toxicity were derived from two European RCTs. Utilities and costs assigned to the BASDAI- disease states were derived from a two years' observational Dutch cohort. In sensitivity analyses probabilities of effectiveness, toxicity, costs and utilities were varied.

Results: Over five years the total Quality Adjusted Life Years varied between 2.57 to 2.89 for usual care compared with 3.13 to 3.42 and 3.07 to 3.35 for etanercept or infliximab. Cumulative costs were between {euro}49,555 to 69,982 for usual care compared with {euro}59,574 to 91,183 or {euro}28,3330 to 106,775 for etanercept and infliximab. This resulted in incremental cost- utility ratios varying between {euro}42,914 and 123,761 per QALY for etanercept compared with usual care and {euro}67,207 to 237,010 for infliximab. The model was sensitive to drug prices.

Conclusion: Etanercept and infliximab have large clinical effects in ankylosing spondylitis. The present model suggests the high drug costs restricts efficient use in all patients who have a BASDAI>4. The validity of the model is limited by insufficient insight in the natural course of the disease and long-term effectiveness and toxicity of TNF-a inhibitors.

Keywords: TNF-alpha inhibitors, ankylosing spondylitis, cost-effectiveness, etanercept, infliximab


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Ara, R. M., Packham, J. C., Haywood, K. L. (2008). The direct healthcare costs associated with ankylosing spondylitis patients attending a UK secondary care rheumatology unit. Rheumatology (Oxford) 47: 68-71 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Botteman, M. F., Hay, J. W., Luo, M. P., Curry, A. S., Wong, R. L., van Hout, B. A. (2007). Cost effectiveness of adalimumab for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis in the United Kingdom. Rheumatology (Oxford) 46: 1320-1328 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kavanaugh, A. (2006). Pharmacoeconomic considerations in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 45: 790-791 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest Rheumatology Jobs

Rheumatology Jobs