Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Response to: ’Protective effects of antimalarials in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus' by Wang et al
Free
  1. Nadine Müller-Calleja,
  2. Karl J Lackner
  1. Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  1. Correspondence to Dr Nadine Müller-Calleja, Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz D-55131, Germany; nadine.mueller-calleja{at}unimedizin-mainz.de

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

In their letter, Wang et al 1 present further data showing impressively the beneficial effects of antimalarials and in particular hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. They refer to our article on the interference of HCQ with proinflammatory signalling pathways.2 We showed that HCQ prevents activation of endosomal NADPH-oxidase (NOX) by cell surface receptors, for example, the receptors for tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) or interleukin-1β (IL-1β). Since signalling of both receptors is mediated in large part but not exclusively by endosomal NOX, HCQ can be regarded as an inhibitor of TNFα and IL-1β. While we would like to agree with Wang et al that this pharmacological effect of HCQ may be an explanation of its therapeutic efficacy, their data do not provide any clue to the potential mechanisms of the observed effects. Numerous other potentially beneficial properties of HCQ have been described in the past.3 Recently, Schreiber et al reported in a small cohort of patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome that treatment with HCQ for 3 months significantly reduced the amount of soluble tissue factor (TF) in plasma.4 Since TF can be induced by antiphospholipid antibodies directly by activation of endosomal NOX5 or indirectly via TNFα, this provides some indirect evidence that inhibition of endosomal NOX may be relevant in vivo in humans. Interestingly, beneficial metabolic effects of HCQ have been described including lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and improving insulin resistance.6 The latter effect would be compatible with an anti-TNFα effect of HCQ. In summary, having identified many pharmacological effects of HCQ, we now need to understand which of them is responsible for the improved patient outcome. This will require clinical studies focused on the different known targets of HCQ.

References

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Josef S Smolen

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles