Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2005;64(Supplement 2 ):ii69-ii73; doi:10.1136/ard.2004.031690
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2005;64:ii69-ii73
© 2005 by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism

DISCUSSION

Assessment: domains and instruments

Discussion: Assessment of psoriatic arthritis

P J Mease, F Behrens, W-H Boehncke, S R Feldman, O FitzGerald, D D Gladman, P S Helliwell, P Nash, I Olivieri, W J Taylor, P-P Tak

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr P J Mease
Seattle Rheumatology Associates, 1101 Madison, Suite 230, Seattle WA 98104, USA; pmease@nwlink.com

Abbreviations: BADSAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; CMC, carpometacarpal (joint); DAS, disease activity score; DIP, distal interphalangeal (joint); PIP, proximal interphalangeal (joint); PsA, psoriatic arthritis; RA, rheumatoid arthritis

Keywords: psoriatic arthritis; GRAPPA

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Many of the following questions reflect items on the research agenda of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) for Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) 8 (May 2006) and will have task forces addressing them in the form of research projects, questionnaires, and consensus exercises.

Which joints should be included in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) assessment: carpometacarpal joints, distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints, feet DIPs? Should we perform 76, 68, 44, or 28 joint counts? Can feet DIPs be distinguished from proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints clinically and/or radiologically? Can they be distinguished from osteoarthritis radiologically? Should we count or score?

Mease: When we set about to assess joints in the original etanercept trial, our assumption was that we needed to capture a larger number of joints than in typical rheumatoid arthritis (RA) trials, including the DIP joints of both hands and feet, as well as the carpometacarpal (CMC) joints which can be commonly affected, thus using a 76/74 joint count. Some have countered that it is difficult in many patients to assess the DIP joints of the feet, especially the smaller ones, and that assessment of the CMC joint may not be valid. Further, radiologists . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest Rheumatology Jobs

Rheumatology Jobs