Ann Rheum Dis

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fernie-King, B
Right arrow Articles by Lachmann, P J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fernie-King, B
Right arrow Articles by Lachmann, P J
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2002;61:ii8-ii12
© 2002 by Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases


REPORT

Subversion of the innate immune response by micro-organisms

B Fernie-King , D J Seilly , A Davies , P J Lachmann

Microbial Immunology Group, Centre for Veterinary Science, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ES, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Sir P L Lachmann;
pjl1000@cam.ac.uk

Keywords: innate immunity; complement evasion; streptococcal inhibitor of complement; secretory leucocyte protease inhibitor

Abbreviations: BSA, bovine serum albumin; CCP, complement control protein; GAS, group A streptococci; HEL, hen egg lysozyme; MAC, membrane attack complex; SCR, short consensus repeat; SIC, streprococcal inhibitor of complement; SLPI, secretory leucocyte protease inhibitor

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

A microbe becomes a pathogen by successfully evading the host’s immune responses, and the microbial strategies for so doing are legion. They include methods to avoid recognition by the immune system—for example, by antigenic variation as shown by influenza and HIV and by parasites or plasmodia, or by acquiring a host coat as is done by worms and retroviruses.

Another major mechanism is to avoid the effector mechanisms of the immune response. This can be done by subverting cytotoxic T cells by the production of decoy HLA molecules; or by subverting Fc function by producing Fc receptor homologues; or by subverting complement by producing homologues of complement control proteins (CCPs). Some viruses also have developed methods of subverting apoptosis in the cells that they infect.

This paper concentrates on the innate immune response. The definition of this term is a little fuzzy. Fearon and Locksley regard all mechanisms using germline . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
D A Elphick and Y R Mahida
Paneth cells: their role in innate immunity and inflammatory disease
Gut, December 1, 2005; 54(12): 1802 - 1809.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism