Ann Rheum Dis

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keystone, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keystone, E
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2002;61:ii43-ii45
© 2002 by Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases


REPORT

Treatments no longer in development for rheumatoid arthritis

E Keystone

The Centre for Advanced Therapeutics, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Canada

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr E Keystone, Mount Sinai Hospital, Room 1005, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X5;
edkeystone@mtsinai.on.ca

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis; T cells

Abbreviations: RA, rheumatoid arthritis; RCT, randomised controlled trial; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.


T CELLS AS THERAPEUTIC TARGETS
Much of our experience with biological agents in autoimmune disease has been derived from studies of T cell directed therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (box 1Go). Data from these studies have provided substantial insight into study design, product development, and T cell biology. Initial studies entailed targeting of CD4 T cells with murine monoclonal antibodies (mAb) of differing isotypes directed at a variety of epitopes on the CD4 molecule. Between 1989–1994, eight short-term open label trials yielded promising results with clinical responses in 60%–75% of patients (reviewed in Strand and Keystone1). In 1996, seven years after the initial studies were published, the first randomised placebo controlled trial (RCT) of murine anti-CD4 mAb showing no clinical benefit was reported.2 A similar discrepancy in clinical outcome between early uncontrolled trials and placebo RCTs was also observed with a murine anti-CD5 immunotoxin conjugate,3 as well as the chimeric anti-CD4 mAb, cM412.4,5 . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
G. C. Pinheiro, M. A. Scheinberg, M. Aparecida da Silva, and S. Maciel
Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide Antibodies in Advanced Rheumatoid Arthritis
Ann Intern Med, August 5, 2003; 139(3): 234 - 235.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism