Recommendations
EULAR Recommendations for monitoring systemic lupus erythematosus patients in clinical practice and in observational studies
1 University of Pisa, Italy;
2 Uuniversity of Pisa, Italy;
3 Technical University of Dresden, Germany;
4 University of Crete Medical School, Greece;
5 University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, United States;
6 Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain;
7 University of Padova, Italy;
8 Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom;
9 Lupus Research Unit, Rayne Institute, United Kingdom;
10 University of Muenster, Germany;
11 University of Birmingham, United Kingdom;
12 Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States;
13 of Medical Biology, Medical Faculty, University of Tromsø, Norway;
14 Heinrich-Heine-University, Germany;
15 Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Israel;
16 Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel;
17 Medical University of Vienna, Austria;
18 Spedali Civili e Università, Brescia, Italy;
19 The Karolinska Institute, Sweden;
20 National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, United States;
21 University of Pennsylvania, United States;
22 Research Unit, Sociedad Española de Reumatología, Spain
Correspondence to: Marta Mosca, Rheumatology, University of Pisa, via Roma 67, Ospedale S.Chiara, Pisa, 56126, Italy; marta.mosca{at}int.med.unipi.it
Accepted 19 October 2009
Objectives: To develop recommendations for monitoring patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in clinical practice and observational studies and to develop a standardized core set of variables to monitor SLE.
Methods: We followed the EULAR standardised procedures for guideline development. The following techniques were applied: nominal group, Delphi surveys for priorisation, small group discussion, systematic literature review, and two Delphi rounds to obtain agreement. The panel included rheumatologists, internists, dermatologists, a nephrologist and an expert related to national research agencies. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were determined according to the Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendations of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.
Results: Ten recommendations have been developed, including the following aspects: patient assessment, cardiovascular risk factors, other risk factors (osteoporosis, cancer), infection risk (screening, vaccination, monitoring), frequency of assessments, laboratory tests, mucocutaneous involvement, kidney monitoring, neuropsychological manifestations and ophthalmology assessment.
A "core set" of minimal variables for the assessment and monitoring of SLE patients in clinical practice was developed that included some of the recommendations. In addition to the recommendations, indications for specific organ assessments that were viewed as part of good clinical practice were discussed and included in the flow chart.
Conclusions: A set of recommendations for monitoring SLE patients in routine clinical practice has been developed. The use of a standardized core set to monitor SLE patients should facilitate clinical practice, as well as the quality control of care for SLE patients, and the collection and comparison of data in observational studies.
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
