Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Ann Rheum Dis. Published Online First: 5 September 2008. doi:10.1136/ard.2008.093757
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism.

Extended Report

A randomised controlled trial of spinal manipulative therapy in acute low back pain

Peter Jüni 1*, Markus Battaglia 2, Eveline Nüesch 1, Gerard Hämmerle 3, Prisca Eser 1, Roger van Beers 2, Daniel Vils 2, Jürg Bernhard 4, Hansruedi Ziswiler 5, Madeleine Dähler 1, Stephan Reichenbach 1 and Peter M Villiger 5

1 University of Bern, Switzerland
2 Medix General Practice Network, Switzerland
3 Schulthess Clinic Zürich, Switzerland
4 Kantonspital Solothurn, Switzerland
5 Inselspital Bern, Switzerland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: juni{at}ispm.unibe.ch.

Accepted 22 August 2008


Abstract

Objective: To determine whether treatment with spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) administered in addition to standard care is associated with clinically relevant early reductions in pain and analgesic consumption.

Methods: We randomised 104 patients with acute low back pain to SMT in addition to standard care (n=52) or standard care alone (n=52). Standard care consisted of general advice and paracetamol, diclofenac or dihydrocodein as required. Other analgesic drugs or non-pharmacological treatments were not allowed. Primary outcomes were pain intensity assessed on the 11 point box scale (BS-11) and analgesic use based on diclofenac equivalence doses during days 1 to 14. An extended follow-up was performed at 6 months.

Results: Pain reductions were similar in experimental and control groups, with the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (95%-CI) excluding a relevant benefit of SMT (difference 0.5 on the BS-11, 95%-CI -0.2 to 1.2, p=0.13). Analgesic consumptions were also similar (difference -18 mg diclofenac equivalents, 95%-CI -43 mg to 7 mg, p=0.17), with small initial differences diminishing over time. There were no differences between groups in any of the secondary outcomes and stratified analyses provided no evidence for potential benefits of SMT in specific patient groups. The extended follow-up showed similar patterns.

Conclusions: SMT is unlikely to result in relevant early pain reduction in patients with acute low back pain. [clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00294229]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Time to Rethink RCTs for Back Pain
B. Kim Humphreys, et al.
Ann Rheum Dis Online, 5 Jan 2009 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest Rheumatology Jobs

Rheumatology Jobs