Ann Rheum Dis. Published Online First: 5 April 2007. doi:10.1136/ard.2006.066001
Extended Report |
Cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients with osteoarthritis treated with Ibuprofen, Naproxen, or Lumiracoxib
1 Mount Sinai School of Medicine, United States
2 NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, United States
3 NYU School of Medicine, United States
4 University Medical Center, Nijmegen, United States
5 Mayo Clinic, United States
6 Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, United States
7 St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, United States
8 University of Chicago at Illinois, United States
9 Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Switzerland
10 Novartis Pharmaceuticals, United States
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: michael.farkouh{at}mssm.edu.
Accepted 21 January 2007
Abstract
Background: Evidence suggests that both selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors and non-selective NSAIDs increase the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. However, evidence from prospective studies of currently available COX-2 inhibitors and non-selective NSAIDs is lacking in high CV risk patients taking aspirin.
Methods: The Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial (TARGET) of 18,325 osteoarthritis patients comprised 2 parallel sub- studies, comparing lumiracoxib (COX-2 inhibitor) to either ibuprofen or naproxen. We performed a post hoc analysis stratified by baseline cardiovascular risk, treatment assignment, and low-dose aspirin use. The primary composite endpoint was cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke at 1 year; a secondary endpoint was the development of congestive heart failure (CHF).
Results: In high risk patients among aspirin users, patients in the ibuprofen sub-study had more primary events with ibuprofen than lumiracoxib (2.14% vs. 0.25%, p=0.038), whereas in the naproxen sub-study rates were similar for naproxen and lumiracoxib (1.58% vs. 1.48%, p=0.899). High risk patients not taking aspirin had fewer primary events with naproxen versus lumiracoxib (0% vs. 1.57%, p=0.027), but not ibuprofen versus lumiracoxib (0.92% vs. 0.80%, p=0.920). Overall, CHF developed more often with ibuprofen than lumiracoxib (1.28% vs. 0.14%; p=0.031), whereas no difference existed between naproxen and lumiracoxib.
Conclusions:These data suggest that ibuprofen may confer an increased risk of thrombotic and CHF events relative to lumiracoxib among aspirin users at high cardiovascular risk. Our study indicates that naproxen may be associated with lower risk relative to lumiracoxib among non-aspirin users. Our data should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating.
Keywords: COX-2 inhibitors, anti-inflammatory agents, non-steroidal, aspirin, coronary disease, osteoarthritis
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Gislason, G. H., Rasmussen, J. N., Abildstrom, S. Z., Schramm, T. K., Hansen, M. L., Fosbol, E. L., Sorensen, R., Folke, F., Buch, P., Gadsboll, N., Rasmussen, S., Poulsen, H. E., Kober, L., Madsen, M., Torp-Pedersen, C.
(2009). Increased Mortality and Cardiovascular Morbidity Associated With Use of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs in Chronic Heart Failure. Arch Intern Med
169: 141-149
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Scott, P. A, Kingsley, G. H., Scott, D. L
(2008). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cardiac failure: meta-analyses of observational studies and randomised controlled trials. Eur J Heart Fail
10: 1102-1107
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Januzzi, J. L. Jr
(2008). Use of Biomarkers to Predict Cardiac Risk from Medications: Getting to the Heart of the Matter. Clin. Chem.
54: 1107-1109
[Full Text] -
Ferrario, C. M.
(2008). Editorial: On the selective inhibitors of Cyclooxygenase-2: Do we have a last word?. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis
2: 75-78
-
(2008). Arthritis drugs are hazardous for high risk patients. Heart
94: 403-403
[Full Text] -
Aneja, A., Farkouh, M. E.
(2008). Review: Adverse cardiovascular effects of NSAIDs: driven by blood pressure, or edema?. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis
2: 53-66
[Abstract]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
