Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 24 October 2008. doi:10.1136/ard.2008.096362
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2009;68:1596-1601
Copyright © 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism.

CLINICAL AND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL RESEARCH

Extended report

Orthopaedic surgery in 255 patients with inflammatory arthropathies: longitudinal effects on pain, physical function and health-related quality of life

H Osnes-Ringen1,2, T K Kvien1,2, J E Henriksen1, P Mowinckel1, H Dagfinrud1,2

1 Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
2 Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Correspondence to Dr H Osnes-Ringen, Department of Surgery, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, PO Box 23, Vindern, N-0319 Oslo, Norway; h-osnes{at}diakonsyk.no

Objective: To examine the effectiveness of orthopaedic surgery in patients with inflammatory arthropathies with regard to longitudinal changes in pain, physical function and health-related quality of life and explore differences in effectiveness between replacement versus non-replacement surgery and surgery in the upper versus the lower limb.

Methods: 255 patients (mean age 57.5 years (SD 13.1), 76.7% female) with inflammatory arthropathies underwent orthopaedic surgical treatment and responded to mail surveys at baseline and during follow-up (3, 6, 9 and 12 months). The booklet of questionnaires included the arthritis impact measurement scales 2 (AIMS2), health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), short form 36 (SF-36), EQ-5D and visual analogue scales (VAS) addressing patient global, fatigue, general pain and pain in the actual joint. Standardised response means (SRM) were calculated to estimate the magnitude of improvement.

Results: Significant improvement was seen for most of the dimensions of health, the largest improvement for pain in the actual joint (SRM 1.17) at one year follow-up. SRM for AIMS-2 physical, SF-36 physical and HAQ were 0.1, 0.48 and 0.05, respectively. The overall numeric improvement (SRM) in utility was 0.10 (0.37) with EQ-5D and 0.03 (0.27) with SF-6D. Improvement overall was similar after surgery in the upper versus the lower limb, but was larger in patients undergoing replacement surgery than in patients undergoing other surgical procedures (SRM 1.54 vs 1.08 for pain in the actual joint).

Conclusions: Surgical procedures have a major positive impact on pain in the actual joint, but improvement is less in other dimensions of health. Health benefits were larger after replacement surgery than after other surgical procedures.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest Rheumatology Jobs

Rheumatology Jobs