Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 27 October 2007. doi:10.1136/ard.2007.082388
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2008;67:315-322
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism.

EXTENDED REPORTS

Gastrointestinal tolerability of etoricoxib in rheumatoid arthritis patients: results of the etoricoxib vs diclofenac sodium gastrointestinal tolerability and effectiveness trial (EDGE-II)

K Krueger1, L Lino2, R Dore3, S Radominski4, Y Zhang5, A Kaur5, R Simpson5, S Curtis5

1 Praxiszentrum St. Bonifatius, Munchen, Germany
2 Hospital General de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
3 University of California, Los Angeles, Anaheim, CA, USA
4 Hospital de Clinicas, Universidade Federal do Parana, Curitba, Brazil
5 Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ, USA

Sean P Curtis, MD, Merck Research Laboratories, P.O. Box 2000, Rahway, New Jersey, USA; sean_curtis{at}merck.com

Objective: A randomised, double-blind study to compare the gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability, safety and efficacy of etoricoxib and diclofenac in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Patients and methods: A total of 4086 patients (mean age 60.8 years) diagnosed with RA were enrolled and received etoricoxib 90 mg daily (n = 2032) or diclofenac 75 mg twice daily (n = 2054). Use of gastroprotective agents and low-dose aspirin was allowed. The prespecified primary end point consisted of the cumulative rate of patient discontinuations due to clinical and laboratory GI adverse experiences (AEs). General safety was also assessed, including adjudicated thrombotic cardiovascular event data. Efficacy was evaluated using the Patient Global Assessment of Disease Status (PGADS; 0–4 point scale).

Results: Mean (SD; maximum) duration of treatment was 19.3 (10.3; 32.9) and 19.1 (10.4; 33.1) months in the etoricoxib and diclofenac groups, respectively. The cumulative discontinuation rate due to GI AEs was significantly lower with etoricoxib than diclofenac (5.2 vs 8.5 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; hazard ratio 0.62 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.81; p<=0.001)). The incidence of discontinuations for hypertension-related and oedema-related AEs were significantly higher with etoricoxib (2.5% and 1.1% respectively) compared with diclofenac (1.5% and 0.4% respectively; p<0.001 for hypertension and p<0.01 for oedema). Etoricoxib and diclofenac treatment resulted in similar efficacy (PGADS mean changes from baseline –0.62 vs –0.58, respectively).

Conclusions: Etoricoxib 90 mg demonstrated a significantly lower risk for discontinuing treatment due to GI AEs compared with diclofenac 150 mg. Discontinuations from renovascular AEs, although less common than discontinuations from GI AEs, were significantly higher with etoricoxib.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Krum, H., Curtis, S. P., Kaur, A., Wang, H., Smugar, S. S., Weir, M. R., Laine, L., Brater, D. C., Cannon, C. P. (2009). Baseline factors associated with congestive heart failure in patients receiving etoricoxib or diclofenac: multivariate analysis of the MEDAL program. Eur J Heart Fail 11: 542-550 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Combe, B., Swergold, G., McLay, J., McCarthy, T., Zerbini, C., Emery, P., Connors, L., Kaur, A., Curtis, S., Laine, L., Cannon, C. P. (2009). Cardiovascular safety and gastrointestinal tolerability of etoricoxib vs diclofenac in a randomized controlled clinical trial (The MEDAL study). Rheumatology (Oxford) 48: 425-432 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest Rheumatology Jobs

Rheumatology Jobs