Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2008;67:206-211
EXTENDED REPORTS
The reliability of a new scoring system for knee osteoarthritis MRI and the validity of bone marrow lesion assessment: BLOKS (Boston–Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score)
1 Boston University Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
2 Tufts University, New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
3 VirtualScopics, Rochester, New York, USA
4 Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
5 Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Dr D Hunter, A203, Boston University School of Medicine, 715 Albany St., Boston, MA 02118; djhunter{at}bu.edu
Aim: MRI provides unparalleled visualisation of all the anatomical structures involved in the osteoarthritis (OA) process. There is a need for reliable methods of quantifying abnormalities of these structures. The aim of this work was to assess the reliability of a novel MRI scoring system for evaluating OA of the knee and explore the validity of the bone marrow lesion (BML) scoring component of this new tool.
Methods: After review of the relevant literature, a collaborative group of rheumatologists and radiologists from centres in the UK and USA established preliminary anatomical divisions, items (necessarily broadly inclusive) and scaling for a novel semi-quantitative knee score. A series of iterative reliability exercises were performed to reduce the initial items, and the reliability of the resultant Boston–Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score (BLOKS) was examined. A further sample had both the BLOKS and WORMS (Whole Organ MRI Score) bone marrow lesion (BML) score performed to assess the construct validity (relation to knee pain) and longitudinal validity (prediction of cartilage loss) of each scoring method.
Results: The BLOKS scoring method assesses nine intra-articular regions and contains eight items, including features of bone marrow lesions, cartilage, osteophytes, synovitis, effusions and ligaments. The scaling for each feature ranges from 0–3. The inter-reader reliability for the final BLOKS items ranged from 0.51 for meniscal extrusion up to 0.79 for meniscal tear. The reliability for other key features was 0.72 for BML grade, 0.72 for cartilage morphology, and 0.62 for synovitis. Maximal BML size on the BLOKS scale had a positive linear relation with visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, however the WORMS scale did not. Baseline BML was associated with cartilage loss on both BLOKS and WORMS scale. This association was stronger for BLOKS than WORMS.
Conclusion: We have designed a novel scoring system for MRI OA knee, BLOKS, that demonstrates good reliability. Preliminary inspection of the validity of one of the components of this new tool supports the validity of the BLOKS BML scoring method over an existing instrument. Further iterative development will include validation for use in both clinical trials and epidemiological studies.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Roemer, F. W., Guermazi, A., Zhang, Y., Yang, M., Hunter, D. J., Crema, M. D., Bohndorf, K.
(2009). Hoffa's Fat Pad: Evaluation on Unenhanced MR Images as a Measure of Patellofemoral Synovitis in Osteoarthritis. Am. J. Roentgenol.
192: 1696-1700
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Guermazi, A., Hunter, D. J., Roemer, F. W.
(2009). Plain Radiography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnostics in Osteoarthritis: Validated Staging and Scoring. JBJS
91: 54-62
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Steiger, P.
(2009). Use of Imaging Biomarkers for Regulatory Studies. JBJS
91: 132-136
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Birrell, F., Arden, N. K.
(2008). A view on the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis from the shoulders of giants. Rheumatology (Oxford)
47: 1263-1264
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
