EXTENDED REPORT

Progression of radiographic damage in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: defining the central role of syndesmophytes

X Baraliakos¹, J Listing², M Rudwaleit³, H Haibel³, J Brandt¹, J Sieper³, J Braun¹

¹ Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
² German Rheumatism Research Center, Berlin, Germany
³ Rheumatology, Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany

Correspondence to:
Professor Dr J Braun
Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Landgrafenstr 15, 44652 Herne, Germany;j.braun{at}rheumazentrum-ruhrgebiet.de

Background: Structural changes such as erosions, syndesmophytes and ankylosis are characteristic of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). These can be quantified by the modified Stokes Anklylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS). It is unknown which radiographic feature is most relevant for the assessment of change and the prediction of future damage in AS.

Objectives: To analyse radiographic progression in AS by using different assessments to define the most important changes.

Methods: Spinal radiographs of 116 patients with AS were scored by the mSASSS at baseline (BL) and after 2 years. Radiographic progression was assessed by differentiating (1) any change; (2) progression to syndesmophytes/ankylosis (definite change); and (3) changes exceeding the smallest detectable change (SDC) as predefined. A growth angle of 45° was used to differentiate syndesmophytes from spondylophytes.

Results: Some radiographic progression after 2 years was detected in 42% of patients, novel syndesmophytes in 31% of patients, and, using the SDC (calculated at 2 mSASSS units) as cut-off, progression was seen in 28% of patients. Thus, in 74% of the patients changes were because of syndesmophytes and/or ankylosis. Using the predefined cut-off, only 12% of all syndesmophytes were spondylophytes. Patients with such changes were of older age. Definite radiographic progression was found in 44% of the patients with syndesmophytes/ankylosis at BL (n = 57) versus 19% (p = 0.03) of the patients without such changes (n = 59).

Conclusions: Syndesmophytes and ankylosis are the most relevant structural changes in AS, and also in the mSASSS. Development of just one syndesmophyte within 2 years indicates progression of structural changes in AS; this is relevant for clinical practice. Syndesmophytes are the best predictors of radiographic progression.

Abbreviations: AS, ankylosing spondylitis; mSASSS, modified Stokes Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score; SDC, smallest detectable change; SDD, smallest detectable difference; TNF, tumour necrosis factor

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Baraliakos, X., Braun, J. (2009). Hip involvement in ankylosing spondylitis: what is the verdict?. Rheumatology (Oxford) 0: kep298v1-kep298 [Full Text]  
• O'Shea, F D, Boyle, E, Riarh, R, Tse, S M, Laxer, R M, Inman, R D (2009). Comparison of clinical and radiographic severity of juvenile-onset versus adult-onset ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 68: 1407-1412 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• BARALIAKOS, X., LISTING, J., von der RECKE, A., BRAUN, J. (2009). The Natural Course of Radiographic Progression in Ankylosing Spondylitis -- Evidence for Major Individual Variations in a Large Proportion of Patients. The Journal of Rheumatology 36: 997-1002 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Braun, J., Sieper, J. (2008). What is the most important outcome parameter in ankylosing spondylitis?. Rheumatology (Oxford) 47: 1738-1740 [Full Text]