Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 15 December 2006. doi:10.1136/ard.2006.061283
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2007;66:727-731
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism.

EXTENDED REPORT

Utility and direct costs: ankylosing spondylitis compared with rheumatoid arthritis

S M M Verstappen1, J W G Jacobs1, D M van der Heijde2, Sj van der Linden2, C M Verhoef3, J W J Bijlsma1, A Boonen2

1 Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
2 Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
3 Department of Rheumatology, Flevo Hospital, Almere, The Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Dr S M M Verstappen
University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, F02.127, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands;s.verstappen{at}umcutrecht.nl

Objectives: To compare utility and disease-specific direct costs between patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the Netherlands.

Methods: Patients with AS and those with RA completed questions on disease characteristics, the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) to assess utility, and questionnaire resource utilisation. Resource utilisation was assessed prospectively in AS, but retrospectively in RA. True cost estimates (2003) were used to calculate the costs. Differences in disease characteristics between AS and RA were described, and determinants of EQ-5D utility and costs were explored by Cox proportional hazard regressions.

Results: 576 patients with RA and 132 with AS completed the questionnaires. EQ-5D utility (0.63 vs 0.7) was lower, and annual direct costs higher in RA ({euro}5167 vs {euro}2574). In multivariate Cox proportional hazard regressions, there was no difference in utility between the diagnostic groups, but patients with RA incurred higher direct costs after controlling for age, gender and disease duration.

Conclusions: In patients with RA and patients with AS, who are under the care of a rheumatologist, utility is equally reduced, but healthcare costs are higher in RA after controlling for age, gender and disease duration. These data can be helpful to provide insights into the differences and similarities between the healthcare needs of both patient groups and to identify issues for further research and for policy in healthcare organisations.

Abbreviations: AS, ankylosing spondylitis; COI, cost of illness; EQ-5D, EuroQol-5D; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; VAS, visual analogue scale


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Singh, J. A., Strand, V. (2009). Health care utilization in patients with spondyloarthropathies. Rheumatology (Oxford) 48: 272-276 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lee, M. S., Pittler, M. H., Ernst, E. (2007). Tai chi for rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 46: 1648-1651 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest Rheumatology Jobs

Rheumatology Jobs