|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EXTENDED REPORT |
1 Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, and Ruhr University Bochum, Germany
2 Division of Rheumatology, University of California San Francisco, California, USA
3 Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Cochin, University of Paris, France
4 Medical Department I, Rheumatology, Benjamin Franklin Hospital, Free University Berlin, and German Rheumatism Research Centre Berlin, Germany
5 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Maastricht, Netherlands
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Prof Dr J Braun
Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Landgrafenstr 15, 44652 Herne, Germany; J.Braun{at}rheumazentrum-ruhrgebiet.de
Objective: To update the international recommendations for use of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.
Methods: The published recommendations on anti-TNF treatment in ankylosing spondylitis formed the basis of the update. A questionnaire was sent to the ASAS (assessment in ankylosing spondylitis) members before the final decisions were agreed upon at an international meeting of the ASAS working group.
Results: Only minor changes to the original consensus statement were required. For the initiation of anti-TNF treatment, there should be: a diagnosis of definitive ankylosing spondylitis (normally based on modified New York criteria); active disease for at least four weeks, as defined by a sustained Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI) of
4 on a 010 scale and expert opinion based on clinical findings; refractory disease, defined by failure of at least two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during a three month period, failure of intra-articular steroids (if indicated), and failure of sulfasalazine in patients with predominantly peripheral arthritis; and application of the usual precautions and contraindications for biological treatment. For monitoring anti-TNF treatment: both the ASAS core set for clinical practice and the BASDAI should be followed after the initiation of treatment. Discontinuation of anti-TNF treatment in non-responders should be considered after 612 weeks. Response is defined by improvement of at least 50% or 2 units (on a 010 scale) of the BASDAI.
Conclusions: This updated consensus statement is recommended in guiding clinical practice and as a basis for developing national guidelines. Evaluation and regular update of this consensus statement is subject to further research by the ASAS group.
Keywords: ankylosing spondylitis; tumour necrosis factor
; infliximab; etanercept; adalimumab
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Braun and J. Sieper What is the most important outcome parameter in ankylosing spondylitis? Rheumatology, September 16, 2008; (2008) ken357v1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Rudwaleit, S Schwarzlose, E S Hilgert, J Listing, J Braun, and J Sieper MRI in predicting a major clinical response to anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment in ankylosing spondylitis Ann Rheum Dis, September 1, 2008; 67(9): 1276 - 1281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Coates, L. S. Cawkwell, N. W. F. Ng, A. N. Bennett, D. J. Bryer, A. D. Fraser, P. Emery, and H. Marzo-Ortega Real life experience confirms sustained response to long-term biologics and switching in ankylosing spondylitis Rheumatology, June 1, 2008; 47(6): 897 - 900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Sieper, T Klopsch, M Richter, A Kapelle, M Rudwaleit, S Schwank, E Regourd, and M May Comparison of two different dosages of celecoxib with diclofenac for the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis: results of a 12-week randomised, double-blind, controlled study Ann Rheum Dis, March 1, 2008; 67(3): 323 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Brandt, I. Spiller, I.-H. Song, J. L Vahldiek, M. Rudwaleit, and J. Sieper Performance of referral recommendations in patients with chronic back pain and suspected axial spondyloarthritis Ann Rheum Dis, November 1, 2007; 66(11): 1479 - 1484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D E Furst, F C Breedveld, J R Kalden, J S Smolen, G R Burmester, J Sieper, P Emery, E C Keystone, M H Schiff, P Mease, et al. Updated consensus statement on biological agents for the treatment of rheumatic diseases, 2007 Ann Rheum Dis, November 1, 2007; 66(suppl_3): iii2 - iii22. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Conti, F. Ceccarelli, E. Marocchi, L. Magrini, F. R. Spinelli, A. Spadaro, R. Scrivo, and G. Valesini Switching tumour necrosis factor {alpha} antagonists in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis: an observational study over a 5-year period Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2007; 66(10): 1393 - 1397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. V. Cruyssen, C. Ribbens, A. Boonen, H. Mielants, K. de Vlam, J. Lenaerts, S. Steinfeld, F. Van den Bosch, L. Dewulf, and N. Vastesaeger The epidemiology of ankylosing spondylitis and the commencement of anti-TNF therapy in daily rheumatology practice Ann Rheum Dis, August 1, 2007; 66(8): 1072 - 1077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Ara, A. V. Reynolds, and P. Conway The cost-effectiveness of etanercept in patients with severe ankylosing spondylitis in the UK Rheumatology, August 1, 2007; 46(8): 1338 - 1344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Braun, N. McHugh, A. Singh, J. S. Wajdula, and R. Sato Improvement in patient-reported outcomes for patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with etanercept 50 mg once-weekly and 25 mg twice-weekly Rheumatology, June 1, 2007; 46(6): 999 - 1004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Smith, K. Gadsby, S. Butt, and C. Deighton The impact of the NICE appraisal consultation document on anti-TNF therapy for ankylosing spondylitis Rheumatology, June 1, 2007; 46(6): 1044 - 1045. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hermann, T. Muller, B. Yazdani-Biuki, M. Aringer, M. Herold, W. Ebner, P. Ofner, and W. Graninger High disease activity of ankylosing spondylitis in the community before the introduction of tumour necrosis factor blockers Ann Rheum Dis, April 1, 2007; 66(4): 561 - 562. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Gadsby and C. Deighton Characteristics and treatment responses of patients satisfying the BSR guidelines for anti-TNF in ankylosing spondylitis Rheumatology, March 1, 2007; 46(3): 439 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Braun, J Zochling, X Baraliakos, R Alten, G Burmester, K Grasedyck, J Brandt, H Haibel, M Hammer, A Krause, et al. Efficacy of sulfasalazine in patients with inflammatory back pain due to undifferentiated spondyloarthritis and early ankylosing spondylitis: a multicentre randomised controlled trial Ann Rheum Dis, September 1, 2006; 65(9): 1147 - 1153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Zochling, D van der Heijde, R Burgos-Vargas, E Collantes, J C Davis Jr, B Dijkmans, M Dougados, P Geher, R D Inman, M A Khan, et al. ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis Ann Rheum Dis, April 1, 2006; 65(4): 442 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |