Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2006;65:1325-1329
EXTENDED REPORT
Minimally important difference in diffuse systemic sclerosis: results from the D-penicillamine study
1 Division of Immunology, Department of Medicine; Institute for the Study of Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA; Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cincinnati
2 Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
3 Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine
4 Department of Biostatistics, David Geffen School of Medicine
5 RAND, Los Angeles
6 University of Michigan Scleroderma Program, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
7 Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunogenetics, The University of TexasHouston Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
8 Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
9 Rheumatology Division, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
10 Division of Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles
11 Division of Rheumatology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois, USA
12 Divison of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
13 Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
14 Division of Rheumatology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
15 Division of Rheumatology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
16 Division of Rheumatology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA
17 Division of Rheumatology, Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
18 Division of Rheumatology, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
19 Division of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
Correspondence to:
D Khanna
Division of Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, ML 0563, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0563, USA;dinesh.khanna{at}uc.edu
Objective: To estimate minimally important differences (MIDs) in scores for the modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) and Health Assessment QuestionnaireDisability Index (HAQ-DI) in a clinical trial on diffuse systemic sclerosis (SSc).
Participants and methods: 134 people participated in a 2-year, double-blind, randomised clinical trial comparing efficacy of low-dose and high-dose D-penicillamine in diffuse SSc. At 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, the investigator was asked to rate the change in the patients health since entering the study: markedly worsened, moderately worsened, slightly worsened, unchanged, slightly improved, moderately improved or markedly improved. Patients who were rated as slightly improved were defined as the minimally changed subgroup and compared with patients rated as moderately or markedly improved.
Results: The MID estimates for the mRSS improvement ranged from 3.2 to 5.3 (0.400.66 effect size) and for the HAQ-DI from 0.10 to 0.14 (0.150.21 effect size). Patients who were rated to improve more than slightly were found to improve by 6.914.2 (0.861.77 effect size) on the mRSS and 0.210.55 (0.320.83 effect size) on the HAQ-DI score.
Conclusion: MID estimates are provided for improvement in the mRSS and HAQ-DI scores, which can help in interpreting clinical trials on patients with SSc and be used for sample size calculation for future clinical trials on diffuse SSc.
Abbreviations: D-Pen, D-penicillamine; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment QuestionnaireDisability Index; HRQOL, health-related quality of life; MID, minimally important difference; mRSS, modified Rodnan Skin Score; SSc, systemic sclerosis
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Khanna, D., Tseng, C.-H., Furst, D. E., Clements, P. J., Elashoff, R., Roth, M., Elashoff, D., Tashkin, D. P., for Scleroderma Lung Study Investigators,
(2009). Minimally important differences in the Mahler's Transition Dyspnoea Index in a large randomized controlled trial--results from the Scleroderma Lung Study. Rheumatology (Oxford)
48: 1537-1540
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
POPE, J. E., KHANNA, D., NORRIE, D., OUIMET, J. M.
(2009). The Minimally Important Difference for the Health Assessment Questionnaire in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Practice Is Smaller Than in Randomized Controlled Trials. The Journal of Rheumatology
36: 254-259
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Hsieh, Y.-W., Wang, C.-H., Sheu, C.-F., Hsueh, I-P., Hsieh, C.-L.
(2008). Estimating the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement Measure. Neurorehabil Neural Repair
22: 723-727
[Abstract] -
Furst, D. E.
(2008). Outcome measures in rheumatologic clinical trials and systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford)
47: v29-v30
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Denton, C P, Pope, J E, Peter, H-H, Gabrielli, A, Boonstra, A, van den Hoogen, F H J, Riemekasten, G, De Vita, S, Morganti, A, Dolberg, M, Berkani, O, Guillevin, L, (on behalf of the TRacleer Use in PAH associated w,
(2008). Long-term effects of bosentan on quality of life, survival, safety and tolerability in pulmonary arterial hypertension related to connective tissue diseases. Ann Rheum Dis
67: 1222-1228
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Khanna, D, Lovell, D J, Giannini, E, Clements, P J, Merkel, P A, Seibold, J R, Matucci-Cerinic, M, Denton, C P, Mayes, M D, Steen, V D, Varga, J, Furst, D E, for the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium co-,
(2008). Development of a provisional core set of response measures for clinical trials of systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis
67: 703-709
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
