|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EXTENDED REPORT |
1 Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
2 Sección de Rheumatologia, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
3 Fédération de Rhumatologie, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
4 Institute of Rheumatology RAMS, Moscow, Russian Federation
5 Academic Unit of Musculoskelatal Diseases, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
6 Service de Rhumatologie, Hôpital Nestlé, CH 1011 Lausanne-CHUV, Switzerland
7 Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
8 Second Department of Medicine, Lower Austrian Centre for Rheumatology, Stockerau, Austria
9 Fédération de Rhumatologie and INSERM U606, IFR 139, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
10 Division of Rheumatology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
11 UMR7561 CNRS-UHP, Physiopathologie et Pharmacologie Articulaire, Universite Henri Poincare, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
12 Osteoarticular Research Group, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
13 Sección de Rheumatologia, Hospital de Cruces, Baracaldo, Spain
14 Departmento Medicina Interna, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
15 Rheumatology Unit, Hospital Egas Moniz, Lisbon, Portugal
16 Rheumatology Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
17 Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
18 Department of Rheumatology, Rehabilitation and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr W Zhang
Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK; weiya.zhang{at}nottingham.ac.uk
Objective: To develop evidence based recommendations for the diagnosis of gout.
Methods: The multidisciplinary guideline development group comprised 19 rheumatologists and one evidence based medicine expert, representing 13 European countries. Ten key propositions regarding diagnosis were generated using a Delphi consensus approach. Research evidence was searched systematically for each proposition. Wherever possible the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio (LR), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were calculated for diagnostic tests. Relative risk and odds ratios were estimated for risk factors and co-morbidities associated with gout. The quality of evidence was categorised according to the evidence hierarchy. The strength of recommendation (SOR) was assessed using the EULAR visual analogue and ordinal scales.
Results: 10 key propositions were generated though three Delphi rounds including diagnostic topics in clinical manifestations, urate crystal identification, biochemical tests, radiographs, and risk factors/co-morbidities. Urate crystal identification varies according to symptoms and observer skill but is very likely to be positive in symptomatic gout (LR = 567 (95% confidence interval (CI), 35.5 to 9053)). Classic podagra and presence of tophi have the highest clinical diagnostic value for gout (LR = 30.64 (95% CI, 20.51 to 45.77), and LR = 39.95 (21.06 to 75.79), respectively). Hyperuricaemia is a major risk factor for gout and may be a useful diagnostic marker when defined by the normal range of the local population (LR = 9.74 (7.45 to 12.72)), although some gouty patients may have normal serum uric acid concentrations at the time of investigation. Radiographs have little role in diagnosis, though in late or severe gout radiographic changes of asymmetrical swelling (LR = 4.13 (2.97 to 5.74)) and subcortical cysts without erosion (LR = 6.39 (3.00 to 13.57)) may be useful to differentiate chronic gout from other joint conditions. In addition, risk factors (sex, diuretics, purine-rich foods, alcohol, lead) and co-morbidities (cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and chronic renal failure) are associated with gout. SOR for each proposition varied according to both the research evidence and expert opinion.
Conclusions: 10 key recommendations for diagnosis of gout were developed using a combination of research based evidence and expert consensus. The evidence for diagnostic tests, risk factors, and co-morbidities was evaluated and the strength of recommendation was provided.
Abbreviations: ESCISIT, EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics; EULAR, European League Against Rheumatism; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; LR, likelihood ratio; MSU, monosodium urate; SOR, strength of recommendation; SUA, serum uric acid; VAS, visual analogue scale
Keywords: EULAR; guidelines; gout; diagnosis
Related Article
Ann Rheum Dis 2006 65: 1312-1324.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L Annemans, E Spaepen, M Gaskin, M Bonnemaire, V Malier, T Gilbert, and G Nuki Gout in the UK and Germany: prevalence, comorbidities and management in general practice 2000-2005 Ann Rheum Dis, July 1, 2008; 67(7): 960 - 966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F Sivera, R Aragon, and E Pascual First metatarsophalangeal joint aspiration using a 29-gauge needle Ann Rheum Dis, February 1, 2008; 67(2): 273 - 275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Doherty, T Bardin, and E Pascual International survey on the diagnosis and management of gout Ann Rheum Dis, December 1, 2007; 66(12): 1685 - 1686. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J N Hoes, J W G Jacobs, M Boers, D Boumpas, F Buttgereit, N Caeyers, E H Choy, M Cutolo, J A P Da Silva, G Esselens, et al. EULAR evidence-based recommendations on the management of systemic glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatic diseases Ann Rheum Dis, December 1, 2007; 66(12): 1560 - 1567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Roddy, W. Zhang, and M. Doherty Are joints affected by gout also affected by osteoarthritis? Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2007; 66(10): 1374 - 1377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Roddy, W. Zhang, and M. Doherty Concordance of the management of chronic gout in a UK primary-care population with the EULAR gout recommendations Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2007; 66(10): 1311 - 1315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Roddy, W. Zhang, and M. Doherty Is gout associated with reduced quality of life? A case-control study Rheumatology, September 1, 2007; 46(9): 1441 - 1444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Jordan, J. S. Cameron, M. Snaith, W. Zhang, M. Doherty, J. Seckl, A. Hingorani, R. Jaques, G. Nuki, and on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology British Society for Rheumatology and British Health Professionals in Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Gout Rheumatology, August 1, 2007; 46(8): 1372 - 1374. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Shoor Review: Sensitivities and specificities vary for different diagnostic tests of gout Evid. Based Med., April 1, 2007; 12(2): 56 - 56. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W Zhang, M Doherty, T Bardin, E Pascual, V Barskova, P Conaghan, J Gerster, J Jacobs, B Leeb, F Liote, et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part II: Management. Report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee For International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT) Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2006; 65(10): 1312 - 1324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |