EXTENDED REPORT

ICF based comparison of disease specific instruments measuring physical functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis

T Sigl¹, A Cieza², D van der Heijde³ and G Stucki¹

¹ Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
² ICF Research Branch, WHO FIC Collaborating Centre (DIMDI), IHRS, Ludwig-Maximilians-University
³ Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Gerold Stucki
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Marchioninistr 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; Gerold.Stucki{at}med.uni-muenchen.de

Objectives: To link validated and widely used instruments measuring physical functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) and to compare their contents, based on the results of the linking process.

Methods: The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the Dougados Functional Index (DFI), the Health Assessment Questionnaire modified for the spondylarthropathies (HAQ-S), and the Revised Leeds Disability Questionnaire (RLDQ) were linked to the ICF separately by two trained health professionals according to 10 linkage rules.

Results: All concepts contained in the items of the selected instruments could be successfully linked to the ICF except for "illness" included in the HAQ-S. Altogether 55 different ICF categories were linked. Seven belonged to "body functions", 43 to "activities and participation", and five to "environmental factors". The component "body structure" was not contained in any of the four instruments. Only two ICF categories were common to all selected questionnaires, but there was a high level of concordance on the concepts represented in them. However, especially in terms of "activities and participation", the emphasised aspects differed.

Conclusions: The ICF provides an excellent common framework for the comparison of disease specific instruments for ankylosing spondylitis. For a future revision of the ICF, a specification of major limitations in patients with ankylosing spondylitis is suggested.

Abbreviations: ASAS, Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis working group; BASFI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index; DFI, Dougados Functional Index; HAQ-S, Health Assessment Questionnaire modified for the spondylarthropathies; ICF, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; RLDQ, Revised Leeds Disability Questionnaire

Keywords: ankylosing spondylitis; functional indices; international classification of function

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Boonen, A., van Berkel, M., Kirchberger, I., Cieza, A., Stucki, G., van der Heijde, D. (2009). Aspects relevant for functioning in patients with ankylosing spondylitis according to the health professionals: a Delphi study with the ICF as reference. Rheumatology (Oxford) 0: kep150v1-kep150 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rat, A.-C., Guillemin, F., Pouchot, J. (2008). Mapping the osteoarthritis knee and hip quality of life (OAKHQOL) instrument to the international classification of functioning, disability and health and comparison to five health status instruments used in osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 47: 1719-1725 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Weigl, M., Cieza, A., Kostanjsek, N., Kirschneck, M., Stucki, G. (2006). The ICF comprehensively covers the spectrum of health problems encountered by health professionals in patients with musculoskeletal conditions. Rheumatology (Oxford) 45: 1247-1254 [Abstract] [Full Text]