HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhang, W Articles by Doherty, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhang, W Articles by Doherty, M

Relative risk of knee chondrocalcinosis in siblings of index cases with pyrophosphate arthropathy

Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr W Zhang
Academic Rheumatology, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK; Weiya.Zhang{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Objectives: To examine the genetic contribution to common, apparently sporadic, radiographic knee chondrocalcinosis (CC) and pyrophosphate arthropathy (PA).

Method: (1) Design: radiographic sibling study. Comparison of the prevalences of knee CC and PA in siblings of index cases with PA with those in the community. (2) Subjects: 80 index cases with PA listed for total knee replacement; 122 of their siblings aged 40 years; and 1729 participants from community knee pain surveys who had undergone knee radiographs. (3) Main outcome measure: odds ratios of knee CC and PA in siblings versus community participants.

Results: The prevalence of knee CC was 13% (15/116) in the siblings and 6.9% (119/1727) in the community participants. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) was 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6 to 2.3. The main risk factors for knee CC were age, knee pain, and knee OA. The prevalence of knee PA was 7% (9/122) in the siblings and 3.4% (59/1729) among the community participants (aOR = 1.1, 95% CI 0.4 to 2.7). The main risk factors for PA were age and knee pain. The age, sex, and knee pain standardised prevalence of PA in the Nottingham community aged 40 was 2.40%.

Conclusion: The risk of knee CC and PA in siblings of index cases with PA is no higher than that in the general population. Although rare familial CC is recognised, this study suggests that no major genetic predisposition to CC occurs in common symptomatic knee OA.

Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; BMI, body mass index; CC, chondrocalcinosis; CI, confidence interval; CPPD, calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate; OA, osteoarthritis; PA, pyrophosphate arthropathy; PFJ, patellofemoral joint; TFJ, tibiofemoral joint

Keywords: chondrocalcinosis; pyrophosphate arthropathy; siblings; knees