Ann Rheum Dis

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ørstavik, R E
Right arrow Articles by Halse, J I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ørstavik, R E
Right arrow Articles by Halse, J I
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2004;63:945-951
© 2004 by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism


EXTENDED REPORT

Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density: discriminatory ability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and controls with and without vertebral deformities

R E Ørstavik 1, G Haugeberg 1, T Uhlig 1, P Mowinckel 1, T K Kvien 1, J A Falch 2, J I Halse 3

1 Oslo City Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Aker Hospital, Oslo
3 Clinic of Osteoporosis, Oslo

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Ragnhild Ørstavik
Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Box 23, Vinderen, N-0319 Oslo, Norway; ragnhild.orstavik{at}ioks.uio.no

Background: Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is a reliable tool for discriminating between subjects with and without vertebral deformities in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Less is known about osteoporosis caused by inflammatory diseases or corticosteroid use.

Objectives: (1) To compare in patients with rheumatoid arthritis the ability of QUS and dual energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA) to discriminate between those with and without vertebral deformities; (2) to explore whether the results are similar in population based controls.

Methods: Standardised lateral radiographs of the spine were obtained from 210 patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged over 50 years and 210 individually matched controls. Vertebral deformities were assessed morphometrically and semiquantitatively. All participants underwent bone measurements by DXA (Lunar Expert) and QUS (Lunar Achilles+). Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was used to compare the discriminating ability of BMD and QUS measurements in patients and controls with and without vertebral deformities. Analyses were repeated in patients stratified according to corticosteroid use.

Results: For all bone measurements except lumbar spine in the rheumatoid arthritis group, BMD discriminated significantly between the patients with and without vertebral deformities, and the results were similar to those obtained in controls. Among current corticosteroid users, neither QUS nor DXA could discriminate between subjects with and without vertebral deformities.

Conclusions: These findings support QUS as an alternative tool for identifying patients at risk of having vertebral deformities in rheumatoid arthritis, although results should be interpreted with caution in current users of corticosteroids.


Abbreviations: ACR, American College of Rheumatology; BMD, bone mineral density; BUA, broadband ultrasound attenuation; DAS, disease activity score; DXA, dual energy x ray absorptiometry; ORAR, Oslo rheumatoid arthritis register; QUS, quantitative ultrasound; SI, stiffness index; SOS, speed of sound

Keywords: quantitative ultrasound; osteoporosis; rheumatoid arthritis; vertebral deformities







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism