|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EXTENDED REPORT |
1 Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
2 Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
3 Pfizer Corporation, USA
4 Department of Medicine, Jyvaskyla Central Hospital, Jyvaskyla, Finland
5 Division of Rheumatology, Case-Western University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
6 Wichita Arthritis Center, University of Kansas School of Medicine, 1035 North Emporia, Suite 230, Wichita, KS 67214, USA
7 Hospital for Special Surgery Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
8 Department of Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor T Pincus
Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 203 Oxford House, Box 5, Nashville, TN 372324500, USA; t.pincus{at}vanderbilt.edu
Background: Acetaminophen (paracetamol) is recommended as the initial pharmacological treatment for knee or hip osteoarthritis. However, survey and clinical trial data indicate greater efficacy for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclo-oxygenase-2 specific inhibitors.
Design: Two randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover multicentre clinical trials, Patient Preference for Placebo, Acetaminophen or Celecoxib Efficacy Studies (PACES).
Patients: Osteoarthritis of knee or hip.
Intervention: "Wash out" of treatment; randomisation; 6 weeks of celecoxib 200 mg/day, acetaminophen 1000 mg four times a day, or placebo; second "wash out;" crossover to 6 weeks of second treatment.
Measurements: Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analogue pain scale, patient preference between two treatments.
Results: Celecoxib was more efficacious than acetaminophen in both periods in both studies; WOMAC and pain scale scores differed at p<0.05 in period II and both periods combined of PACES-a and in periods I and II and both periods combined in PACES-b, but not in period I of PACES-a. Acetaminophen was more efficacious than placebo, generally p<0.05 in PACES-b, and >0.05 in PACES-a. Patient preferences were 53% celecoxib v 24% acetaminophen in PACES-a (p<0.001) and 50% v 32% in PACES-b (p = 0.009); 37% acetaminophen v 28% placebo in PACES-a (p = 0.340) and 48% v 24% in PACES-b (p = 0.007). No clinically or statistically significant differences were seen in adverse events or tolerability among the three treatment groups.
Conclusions: Greater efficacy was seen for celecoxib v acetaminophen v placebo, while adverse events and tolerability were similar. Variation in results and statistical significance in the two different trials are of interest.
Abbreviations: MDHAQ, Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire; NSAIDs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; SF-36, Short Form-36; WOMAC, Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index
Keywords: celecoxib; osteoarthritis; acetaminophen; placebo; WOMAC; pain visual analogue scale; paracetamol
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P A Scott, G H Kingsley, C M Smith, E H Choy, and D L Scott Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and myocardial infarctions: comparative systematic review of evidence from observational studies and randomised controlled trials Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2007; 66(10): 1296 - 1304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Rahme and H. Nedjar Risks and benefits of COX-2 inhibitors vs non-selective NSAIDs: does their cardiovascular risk exceed their gastrointestinal benefit? A retrospective cohort study Rheumatology, March 1, 2007; 46(3): 435 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F P Luyten, P Geusens, M Malaise, L De Clerck, R Westhovens, F Raeman, D Vander Mijnsbrugge, L Mathy, J P Hauzeur, F De Keyser, et al. A prospective randomised multicentre study comparing continuous and intermittent treatment with celecoxib in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip Ann Rheum Dis, January 1, 2007; 66(1): 99 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y Yazici and H Yazici A survey of inclusion of the time element when reporting adverse effects in randomised controlled trials of cyclo-oxygenase-2 and tumour necrosis factor {alpha} inhibitors Ann Rheum Dis, January 1, 2007; 66(1): 124 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Yelland, C. J. Nikles, N. McNairn, C. B. Del Mar, P. J. Schluter, and R. M. Brown Celecoxib compared with sustained-release paracetamol for osteoarthritis: a series of n-of-1 trials Rheumatology, January 1, 2007; 46(1): 135 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lehman Evidently... Evid. Based Med., February 1, 2005; 10(1): 8 - 8. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Other articles noted Evid. Based Med., February 1, 2005; 10(1): 31 - 32. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Denoeud, B Mazieres, C Payen-Champenois, and P Ravaud First line treatment of knee osteoarthritis in outpatients in France: adherence to the EULAR 2000 recommendations and factors influencing adherence Ann Rheum Dis, January 1, 2005; 64(1): 70 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E Roddy, W Zhang, M Doherty, and M. Dougados Home based exercise for osteoarthritis * Author's reply Ann Rheum Dis, January 1, 2005; 64(1): 170 - 171. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Neame, W Zhang, and M Doherty A historic issue of the Annals: three papers examine paracetamol in osteoarthritis Ann Rheum Dis, August 1, 2004; 63(8): 897 - 900. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Miceli-Richard, M Le Bars, N Schmidely, and M Dougados Paracetamol in osteoarthritis of the knee Ann Rheum Dis, August 1, 2004; 63(8): 923 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |