Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2004;63:1288-1292; doi:10.1136/ard.2003.014712
Copyright © 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2004;63:1288-1292
© 2004 by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism

EXTENDED REPORT

Interrater reproducibility of clinical tests for rotator cuff lesions

A J K Ostor, C A Richards, A T Prevost, B L Hazleman and C A Speed

Rheumatology Research Unit, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr A J K Ostor
Rheumatology Research Unit, Box 194, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK; andrew.ostor{at}addenbrookes.nhs.uk

Background: Rotator cuff lesions are common in the community but reproducibility of tests for shoulder assessment has not been adequately appraised and there is no uniform approach to their use.

Objective: To study interrater reproducibility of standard tests for shoulder evaluation among a rheumatology specialist, rheumatology trainee, and research nurse.

Methods: 136 patients were reviewed over 12 months at a major teaching hospital. The three assessors examined each patient in random order and were unaware of each other’s evaluation. Each shoulder was examined in a standard manner by recognised tests for specific lesions and a diagnostic algorithm was used. Between-observer agreement was determined by calculating Cohen’s {kappa} coefficients (measuring agreement beyond that expected by chance).

Results: Fair to substantial agreement was obtained for the observations of tenderness, painful arc, and external rotation. Tests for supraspinatus and subscapularis also showed at least fair agreement between observers. 40/55 (73%) {kappa} coefficient assessments were rated at >0.2, indicating at least fair concordance between observers; 21/55 (38%) were rated at >0.4, indicating at least moderate concordance between observers.

Conclusion: The reproducibility of certain tests, employed by observers of varying experience, in the assessment of the rotator cuff and general shoulder disease was determined. This has implications for delegation of shoulder assessment to nurse specialists, the development of a simplified evaluation schedule for general practitioners, and uniformity in epidemiological research studies.

Keywords: shoulders; epidemiology; rotator cuff lesions; reproducibility


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Hegedus, E J, Goode, A, Campbell, S, Morin, A, Tamaddoni, M, Moorman, C T III, Cook, C (2008). Physical examination tests of the shoulder: a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual tests. Br. J. Sports. Med. 42: 80-92 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mitchell, C., Adebajo, A., Hay, E., Carr, A. (2005). Shoulder pain: diagnosis and management in primary care. BMJ 331: 1124-1128 [Full Text]  
  • Ostor, A. J. K., Richards, C. A., Prevost, A. T., Speed, C. A., Hazleman, B. L. (2005). Diagnosis and relation to general health of shoulder disorders presenting to primary care. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44: 800-805 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest Rheumatology Jobs

Rheumatology Jobs