|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
EXTENDED REPORT |
1 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands
2 EA 3444- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, University Hospital Nancy, France
3 Department of Methodology and Statistics, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands
4 Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
5 Department of Rheumatology, Université Réné Descartes, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
6 Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Gent, Belgium
7 Maasland Ziekenhuis Sittart, The Netherlands
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr A Boonen, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands;
aboo{at}sint.azm.nl
Objective: To assess a patients out of pocket costs, income loss, time consumption, and quality of life (QoL) due to ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in three European countries and to assess variables predicting these outcomes.
Methods: 216 patients with AS from the Netherlands, France, and Belgium participated in a two year study. Health resource use, days absent from work, time lost, and quality of life (EuroQol) were assessed by bimonthly questionnaires. AS related healthcare and non-healthcare expenditure and income loss were calculated taking into account country-specific regulations. Predictors of costs, time consumption, and QoL were analysed by Coxs regression.
Results: 209 patients provided data for cost analysis. Average annual healthcare and non-healthcare expenditure was €431 per patient and average annual income loss was €1371 per patient. Healthcare costs were highest for Belgian and lowest for French patients, while non-healthcare costs were highest for Dutch patients. A patients total costs were associated with higher age and worse physical function. On average, patients with AS needed 75 minutes additional time a day because of AS. Worse physical function and higher disease activity predicted time consumption. After adjusting for baseline confounders, QoL was worse in Belgian and French than in Dutch patients. Peripheral arthritis, worse physical function, higher disease activity, and loss of income contributed to worse QoL.
Conclusion: AS is time consuming and associated with substantial out of pocket costs. Belgian patients incur the highest healthcare payments. Poor physical function increases patients costs and time consumption. Loss of income is associated with lower QoL.
Keywords: ankylosing spondylitis; costs; patients perspective
Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; AS, ankylosing spondylitis; BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; BASFI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index; EQ-5D, EuroQol 5 dimensions; HR, hazard ratio; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; QoL, quality of life; RA, rheumatoid arthritis
Relevant Article
Ann Rheum Dis 2003 62: 732-740.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Boonen, D. van der Heijde, R. Landewe, A. van Tubergen, H. Mielants, M. Dougados, and S. van der Linden How do the EQ-5D, SF-6D and the well-being rating scale compare in patients with ankylosing spondylitis? Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 2007; 66(6): 771 - 777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Boonen, D van der Heijde, J L Severens, A Boendermaker, R Landewe, J Braun, J Brandt, J Sieper, and S. van der Linden Markov model into the cost-utility over five years of etanercept and infliximab compared with usual care in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis Ann Rheum Dis, February 1, 2006; 65(2): 201 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J L Hulsemann, T Mittendorf, S Merkesdal, S Zeh, S Handelmann, J- M von der Schulenburg, H Zeidler, and J Ruof Direct costs related to rheumatoid arthritis: the patient perspective Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2005; 64(10): 1456 - 1461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. T. Dawes, J. C. Packham, and J. C. Mucklow TNF therapy for spondyloarthropathy: can we marshal the argument? Rheumatology, September 1, 2004; 43(9): 1069 - 1071. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |