|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
EXTENDED REPORT |
1 Department of Rheumatology, René Descartes University, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
2 Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3 Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
4 Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
5 Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
6 Department of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, UKBF, Free University, Berlin, Germany
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr M Dougados, Clinique de Rhumatologie, Hôpital Cochin, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, F-75014 Paris, France;
maxime.dougados{at}cch.ap-hop-paris.fr
Management of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is challenged by the progressive nature of the disease. To date, no intervention is available that alters the underlying mechanism of inflammation in AS. Currently available conventional treatments are palliative at best, and often fail to control symptoms in the long term. Current drug treatment may perhaps induce a spurious state of "disease remission," which is merely a low level of disease activity. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are first line treatment, but over time, the disease often becomes refractory to these agents. Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs are second line treatment and may offer some clinical benefit. However, conclusive evidence of the efficacy of these drugs from large placebo controlled trials is lacking. Additionally, these drugs can cause treatment-limiting adverse effects. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection guided by arthrography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging is an effective means of reducing inflammatory back pain, but controlled studies are lacking. A controlled study has confirmed moderate but significant efficacy of intravenous bisphosphonate (pamidronate) treatment in patients with AS; further evaluation of bisphosphonate treatment is warranted. Physical therapy and exercise are necessary adjuncts to pharmacotherapy; however, the paucity of controlled data makes it difficult to identify the best way to administer these interventions. Surgical intervention may be required to support severe structural damage. Thus, for patients with AS, the future of successful treatment lies in the development of pharmacological agents capable of both altering the disease course through intervention at sites of disease pathogenesis, and controlling symptoms.
Keywords: ankylosing spondylitis; corticosteroid; disease modifying antirheumatic drugs; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Abbreviations: AS, ankylosing spondylitis; 5-ASA, 5-acetylsalicylic acid; ASAS, Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis (Working Group); BASDAI, Bath AS Disease Activity Index; BASFI, Bath AS Functional Index; BASGI, Bath AS Global Index; BASMI, Bath AS Metrology Index; COX, cyclo-oxygenase; CRP, C reactive protein; CT, computed tomography; DMARD, disease modifying antirheumatic drug; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; IV, intravenous; MES, mesalazine; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SP, sulfapyridine; SpA, spondyloarthropathy; SSZ, sulfasalazine; THA, total hip arthroplasty; VAS, visual analogue scale
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J Sieper, T Klopsch, M Richter, A Kapelle, M Rudwaleit, S Schwank, E Regourd, and M May Comparison of two different dosages of celecoxib with diclofenac for the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis: results of a 12-week randomised, double-blind, controlled study Ann Rheum Dis, March 1, 2008; 67(3): 323 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Brandt, I. Spiller, I.-H. Song, J. L Vahldiek, M. Rudwaleit, and J. Sieper Performance of referral recommendations in patients with chronic back pain and suspected axial spondyloarthritis Ann Rheum Dis, November 1, 2007; 66(11): 1479 - 1484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. V. Cruyssen, C. Ribbens, A. Boonen, H. Mielants, K. de Vlam, J. Lenaerts, S. Steinfeld, F. Van den Bosch, L. Dewulf, and N. Vastesaeger The epidemiology of ankylosing spondylitis and the commencement of anti-TNF therapy in daily rheumatology practice Ann Rheum Dis, August 1, 2007; 66(8): 1072 - 1077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Pham, R Landewe, S van der Linden, M Dougados, J Sieper, J Braun, J Davis, M Rudwaleit, E Collantes, R Burgos-Vargas, et al. An international study on starting tumour necrosis factor-blocking agents in ankylosing spondylitis Ann Rheum Dis, December 1, 2006; 65(12): 1620 - 1625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Sieper and M Rudwaleit How early should ankylosing spondylitis be treated with tumour necrosis factor blockers? Ann Rheum Dis, November 1, 2005; 64(suppl_4): iv61 - iv64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Sieper and M Rudwaleit Early referral recommendations for ankylosing spondylitis (including pre-radiographic and radiographic forms) in primary care Ann Rheum Dis, May 1, 2005; 64(5): 659 - 663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Rudwaleit, J Listing, J Brandt, J Braun, and J Sieper Prediction of a major clinical response (BASDAI 50) to tumour necrosis factor {alpha} blockers in ankylosing spondylitis Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 2004; 63(6): 665 - 670. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
N Feltelius, A Ekbom, and P Blomqvist Cancer incidence among patients with ankylosing spondylitis in Sweden 1965-95: a population based cohort study Ann Rheum Dis, December 1, 2003; 62(12): 1185 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |