Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2001;60:841-845
Copyright © 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism.
Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:841-845 ( September )

Extended report

Health Assessment Questionnaire modifications: is standardisation needed? M M Zandbelt, P M J Welsing, A M van Gestel, P L C M van Riel

Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Correspondence to: Dr M M Zandbelt, Department of Rheumatology, UMC St Radboud Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands M.Zandbelt{at}reuma.azn.nl

Accepted for publication 9 February 2000

BACKGROUND---Physical disability is part of the end point measures in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI) is often used for this purpose but lacks international uniformity owing to variations in the translated and adapted questionnaires and variations in its calculation. To study the consequences of these variations the previous Dutch HAQ (HAQ90) was revised, resulting in a new Dutch HAQ (HAQ99).
OBJECTIVE---To compare DI scores from the two versions, and to study the consequences of applying different calculation methods for the DI score.
METHODS---78 patients completed both the HAQ99 and the HAQ90. To compare the use of different category score calculation methods a post hoc analysis on prospectively collected data obtained in clinical trials was performed.
RESULTS---No statistically significant differences were observed between the DI scores of the HAQ90 and the HAQ99 using the alternative method (that is, without correcting for aid and devices). However, correcting for the use of aid or devices or not did result in statistically significant different DI scores. The systematic shift when using the maximum or mean item score for calculation of the category score resulted in non-comparable absolute DI scores.
CONCLUSION---The use of HAQ DI questionnaires with different numbers of items and/or categories does not hinder international comparability, except when these variations interfere with the calculation method of the DI (as in the case of questionnaires without a section correcting for devices). For the sake of international uniformity the HAQ or any validated translation should be used and calculated in a standard way, including correcting for the use of aid and devices, and taking the maximum within each category as the category score.


© 2001 by Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kievit, W, Fransen, J, Adang, E M, Kuper, H H, Jansen, T L, De Gendt, C M A, De Rooij, D J R A M, Brus, H L M, van de Laar, M A F J, Van Riel, P C L M (2009). Evaluating guidelines on continuation of anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment after 3 months: clinical effectiveness and costs of observed care and different alternative strategies. Ann Rheum Dis 68: 844-849 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kievit, W, Adang, E M, Fransen, J, Kuper, H H, van de Laar, M A F J, Jansen, T L, De Gendt, C M A, De Rooij, D-J R A M, Brus, H L M, Van Oijen, P C M, Van Riel, P C L M (2008). The effectiveness and medication costs of three anti-tumour necrosis factor {alpha} agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis from prospective clinical practice data. Ann Rheum Dis 67: 1229-1234 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Boers, M, Jacobs, J W G, van Vliet Vlieland, T P M, van Riel, P L C M (2007). Consensus Dutch Health Assessment Questionnaire. Ann Rheum Dis 66: 132-133 [Full Text]  
  • Fransen, J, Moens, H B., Speyer, I, van Riel, P L C M (2005). Effectiveness of systematic monitoring of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity in daily practice: a multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 64: 1294-1298 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dadoniene, J, Uhlig, T, Stropuviene, S, Venalis, A, Boonen, A, Kvien, T K (2003). Disease activity and health status in rheumatoid arthritis: a case-control comparison between Norway and Lithuania. Ann Rheum Dis 62: 231-235 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest Rheumatology Jobs

Rheumatology Jobs