Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:834-840 ( September )

Extended report

Responsiveness of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index as compared with the SF-36 in patients with osteoarthritis of the legs undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention F Angst^a, A Aeschlimann^a, W Steiner^b, G Stucki^c

^a Clinic of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Zurzach, Switzerland, ^b Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation of the University of Zurich, Switzerland, ^c Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation of the University of Munich, Germany

Correspondence to: Dr F Angst, Schiedhaldenstrasse 1, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland fangst{at}datacomm.ch

Accepted for publication 9 February 2001

OBJECTIVETo compare the responsiveness of the condition-specific Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis (OA) index (WOMAC) and the generic Short Form-36 (SF-36) in patients with OA of the legs undergoing a comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation intervention.
METHODSA prospective follow up study of consecutively referred inpatients of a rehabilitation clinic was made. The patients included fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology criteria for knee or hip OA and underwent both passive and, particularly, active physical therapy for three to four weeks. Responsiveness assessment was performed using the standardised response mean (SRM), effect size, and Guyatt's responsiveness statistic between admission and discharge (end of rehabilitation) and then again between admission and three months later. For pain and function the SRMs were stratified by sex and OA joint. Effects were tested by the t test and SRMs of different scales were compared by the jack knife test.
RESULTSAt the three month follow up, complete data were obtained for 223 patients. In general, the three responsiveness statistics showed a similar order of responsiveness. For both instruments, the pain scales were more responsive than the function scales. The responsiveness of the pain scale of both instruments was comparable (SRM=0.723 for WOMAC and SRM=0.528 for SF-36 at the end of rehabilitation; SRM=0.377 for WOMAC and SRM=0.468 for SF-36 at the three month follow up). In the measurement of function, the WOMAC was significantly more responsive than the SF-36 (SRMs, end of rehabilitation: 0.628 v 0.249; three month follow up: 0.235 v 0.001). Responsiveness tended to be higher in women and in knee OA than in men and hip OA.
CONCLUSIONSBoth instruments, the WOMAC and the SF-36, capture improvement in pain in patients undergoing comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation intervention. Functional improvement can be detected better by the WOMAC than by the SF-36. All the other scales of both instruments were more weakly responsive.

---

© 2001 by Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Ilfeld, B. M., Ball, S. T., Gearen, P. F., Mariano, E. R., Le, L. T., Vandenborne, K., Duncan, P. W., Sessler, D. I., Enneking, F. K., Shuster, J. J., Maldonado, R. C., Meyer, R. S. (2009). Health-Related Quality of Life After Hip Arthroplasty With and Without an Extended-Duration Continuous Posterior Lumbar Plexus Nerve Block: A Prospective, 1-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized, Triple-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Study. Anesth. Analg. 109: 586-591 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ilfeld, B. M., Meyer, R. S., Le, L. T., Mariano, E. R., Williams, B. A., Vandenborne, K., Duncan, P. W., Sessler, D. I., Enneking, F. K., Shuster, J. J., Maldonado, R. C., Gearen, P. F. (2009). Health-Related Quality of Life After Tricompartment Knee Arthroplasty With and Without an Extended-Duration Continuous Femoral Nerve Block: A Prospective, 1-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized, Triple-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Study. Anesth. Analg. 108: 1320-1325 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• van den Akker-Scheek, I., Zijlstra, W., Groothoff, J. W, Bulstra, S. K, Stevens, M. (2008). Physical Functioning Before and After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Perception and Performance. ptjournal 88: 712-719 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Deutsch, L. (2007). Evaluation of the Effect of Neptune Krill Oil on Chronic Inflammation and Arthritic Symptoms. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 26: 39-48 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Robinson, P., Keenan, A.-M., Conaghan, P. G. (2007). Clinical effectiveness and dose response of image-guided intra-articular corticosteroid injection for hip osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 46: 285-291 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Yang, K. G. A., Raijmakers, N. J. H., Verbout, A. J., Dhert, W. J. A., Saris, D. B. F. (2007). Validation of the short-form WOMAC function scale for the evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89-B: 50-56 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lindemann, U, Becker, C, Muche, R, Aminian, K, Dejnabadi, H, Nikolaus, T., Puhl, W, Huch, K, Dreinhofer, K E (2006). Gait analysis and WOMAC are complementary in assessing functional outcome in total hip replacement. Clin Rehabil 20: 413-420 [Abstract]  
• Quintana, J. M., Escobar, A., Arostegui, I., Bilbao, A., Azkarate, J., Goenaga, J. I., Arenaza, J. C. (2006). Health-Related Quality of Life and Appropriateness of Knee or Hip Joint Replacement. Arch Intern Med 166: 220-226 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Harlow, T., Greaves, C., White, A., Brown, L., Hart, A., Ernst, E. (2004). Randomised controlled trial of magnetic bracelets for relieving pain in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. BMJ 329: 1450-1454 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Picavet, H S J, Hoeymans, N (2004). Health related quality of life in multiple musculoskeletal diseases: SF-36 and EQ-5D in the DMC3 study. Ann Rheum Dis 63: 723-729 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Weigl, M, Angst, F, Stucki, G, Lehmann, S, Aeschlimann, A (2004). Inpatient rehabilitation for hip or knee osteoarthritis: 2 year follow up study. Ann Rheum Dis 63: 360-368 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Nilsdotter, A-K, Petersson, I F, Roos, E M, Lohmander, L S (2003). Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis 62: 923-930 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hoeksma, H L, Van den Ende, C H M, Ronday, H K, Heering, A, Breedveld, F C, Dekker, J (2003). Comparison of the responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score with generic measures for hip function in osteoarthritis of the hip. Ann Rheum Dis 62: 935-938 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Haq, I, Murphy, E, Dacre, J (2003). Osteoarthritis. Postgrad. Med. J. 79: 377-383 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jones, J G, Leighton, F, Angst, F, Aeschlimann, A (2002). Comparison of WOMAC with SF-36 for OA of the knee or hip. Ann Rheum Dis 61: 182-183 [Full Text]