Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2001;60:799-801; doi:10.1136/ard.60.8.799
Copyright © 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism.
Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:799-801 ( August )

Concise report

Value of clinical factors in selecting postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis for bone densitometry J M Nolla, J Fiter, C Gómez-Vaquero, J J Alegre, J Valverde, D Roig-Escofet

Rheumatology Department, Ciutat Sanitària i Universitària de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain

Correspondence to: Dr J M Nolla, Rheumatology Department (Pl 10-2), Ciutat Sanitària i Universitària de Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 L'Hospitalet (Barcelona), Spain 28634apj{at}comb.es

Accepted for publication 4 January 2001

OBJECTIVE---Criteria to decide which patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) should be examined by dual energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA) are currently not available. The rheumatologists from Amsterdam have proposed preliminary criteria based on clinical risk factors (age, disease activity, and functional status). These criteria are preliminary and not widely accepted but might be helpful in practice. The value of the proposal in a group of Spanish postmenopausal women with RA is analysed.
METHODS---DXA (lumbar spine and femoral neck) was performed in 128 patients recruited from a clinical setting, and the proposed criteria were applied. T and Z scores were established for a Spanish reference population.
RESULTS---The mean (SD) age of the patients was 61.3 (10.7) and mean duration of the postmenopausal period 14.5 (10.1) years. Mean duration of RA was 13.7 (7.7) years. Mean C reactive protein was 22 (21) mg/l; mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate 26 (18) mm/1st h; and mean Health Assessment Questionnaire score 1.25 (0.79). Ninety (70%) patients fulfilled the proposed criteria. Their sensitivity for the diagnosis of osteoporosis (T score =<-2.5 SD) was 86% and their specificity, 43%. Positive predictive value was 54% and negative predictive value, 79%.
CONCLUSIONS---The proposed criteria seem a good screening method for the selection of those patients with RA whose bone mineral density should be assessed as the sensitivity and negative predictive value are acceptable.


© 2001 by Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Haugeberg, G, Orstavik, R E, Uhlig, T, Falch, J A, Halse, J I, Kvien, T K (2002). Clinical decision rules in rheumatoid arthritis: do they identify patients at high risk for osteoporosis? Testing clinical criteria in a population based cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis recruited from the Oslo Rheumatoid Arthritis Register. Ann Rheum Dis 61: 1085-1089 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest Rheumatology Jobs

Rheumatology Jobs