Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2001;60:566-572; doi:10.1136/ard.60.6.566
Copyright © 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism.
Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:566-572 ( June )

Extended report

Comparative study of intramuscular gold and methotrexate in a rheumatoid arthritis population from a socially deprived area J Hamiltona, I B McInnesa, E A Thomsonb, D Porterb, J A Hunterb, R Madhoka, H A Capella

a Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, United Kingdom, b Gartnaval General Hospital, Great Western Road, Glasgow, United Kingdom

Correspondence to: Dr Hamilton jendh{at}emailmsn.com

Accepted for publication 15 December 2000

OBJECTIVE---To compare the risk-benefit ratio of intramuscular gold (gold sodium thiomalate (GST)) and methotrexate (MTX) in a population with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from a deprived area.
METHODS---Patients with active RA were randomly assigned to open treatment with GST or MTX. Clinical and laboratory assessment was performed at 0, 12, 24, and 48 weeks. Results were analysed on an intention to treat basis.
RESULTS---141 patients were recruited---72 were randomly allocated to GST and 69 to MTX. There were no statistically significant differences found in either the clinical or demographic variables at baseline. At 48 weeks 31 (43%) patients continued to receive GST and 43 (62%) MTX. The median MTX dose achieved was 10 mg. Gold caused significantly more withdrawals for toxicity (43% GST v 19% MTX, p=0.0026, log rank test). Both groups experienced a significant improvement in erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C reactive protein, Ritchie Articular Index, and pain score by 24 weeks (p<0.001, Friedman test). Although a trend towards an improved Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score and global wellbeing was seen in both groups, this did not reach statistical significance. No differences in efficacy were found when the two groups were compared (Mann-Whitney).
CONCLUSION---GST and low dose MTX showed equivalent efficacy, but toxicity was more common in patients treated with GST. GST, although more toxic, remains a useful alternative for patients in whom MTX is contraindicated.


© 2001 by Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kinder, A. J., Hassell, A. B., Brand, J., Brownfield, A., Grove, M., Shadforth, M. F. (2005). The treatment of inflammatory arthritis with methotrexate in clinical practice: treatment duration and incidence of adverse drug reactions. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44: 61-66 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest Rheumatology Jobs

Rheumatology Jobs