|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Academic
Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building,
City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
Correspondence to: Professor Doherty Email: Michael.Doherty{at}Nottingham.ac.uk
Accepted for publication 15 February 2000
OBJECTIVES
To
(a) develop an atlas of line drawings for
the assessment and grading of narrowing and osteophyte (that is,
changes of osteoarthritis) on knee radiographs, and
(b) compare the performance of this atlas with that of the standard Osteoarthritis Research Society (OARS) photographic atlas of radiographs.
METHODS
Normal
joint space widths (grade 0) for the medial and lateral
tibiofemoral and medial and lateral patellofemoral compartments were obtained from a previous community study. Grades 1-3 narrowing in
each compartment was calculated separately for men and women, grade 3 being bone on bone, grades 1 and 2 being two thirds and one third the
value of grade 0. Maximum osteophyte size (grade 3) for each of eight
sites was determined from 715 bilateral knee x ray films obtained in a knee
osteoarthritis (OA) hospital clinic; grades 1-2 were calculated as two
thirds and one third reductions in the area of grade 3. Drawings for
narrowing and osteophyte were presented separately. 50 sets of
bilateral knee x ray radiographs (standing,
extended anteroposterior; flexed skyline) showing a spectrum of OA
grades were scored by three observers, twice using the OARS atlas and
twice using the drawn atlas.
RESULTS
Intraobserver
and interobserver reproducibility was similar and generally good with
both atlases, though varied according to site. All three observers
preferred the line drawing atlas for ease and convenience of use.
Higher scores for patellofemoral narrowing and lower scores for
osteophyte, especially medial femoral osteophyte, were seen using the
line drawing atlas, showing that the two atlases are not equivalent instruments.
CONCLUSION
A logically
derived line drawing atlas for grading of narrowing and osteophyte at
the knee has been produced. The atlas showed comparable reproducibility
with the OARS atlas, but was discordant in several aspects of grading.
Such a system has several theoretical and practical advantages and
should be considered for use in knee OA studies.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Kumm, A. Tamm, K. Veske, M. Lintrop, and A. Tamm Associations between cartilage oligomeric matrix protein and several articular tissues in early knee joint osteoarthritis Rheumatology, October 1, 2006; 45(10): 1308 - 1309. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C E Wilkinson, A J Carr, and M Doherty Does increasing the grades of the knee osteoarthritis line drawing atlas alter its clinimetric properties? Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2005; 64(10): 1467 - 1473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R L Neame, K Muir, S Doherty, and M Doherty Genetic risk of knee osteoarthritis: a sibling study Ann Rheum Dis, September 1, 2004; 63(9): 1022 - 1027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R L Neame, A J Carr, K Muir, and M Doherty UK community prevalence of knee chondrocalcinosis: evidence that correlation with osteoarthritis is through a shared association with osteophyte Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 2003; 62(6): 513 - 518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y Nagaosa, P Lanyon, and M Doherty Characterisation of size and direction of osteophyte in knee osteoarthritis: a radiographic study Ann Rheum Dis, April 1, 2002; 61(4): 319 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |