Now and then
The Southampton examination schedule for the diagnosis of
musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb
Keith Palmer, Karen Walker-Bone, Cathy Linaker, Isabel Reading, Samantha Kellingray, David Coggon, Cyrus Cooper
The MRC
Environmental Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton
General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD
Correspondence to: Dr Palmer
Accepted for publication 5 October 1999
OBJECTIVES
Following a
consensus statement from a multidisciplinary UK workshop, a structured
examination schedule was developed for the diagnosis and classification
of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. The aim of this study
was to test the repeatability and the validity of the newly developed
schedule in a hospital setting.
METHOD
43 consecutive
referrals to a soft tissue rheumatism clinic (group 1) and 45 subjects
with one of a list of specific upper limb disorders (including shoulder
capsulitis, rotator cuff tendinitis, lateral epicondylitis and
tenosynovitis) (group 2), were recruited from hospital rheumatology and
orthopaedic outpatient clinics. All 88 subjects were examined by a
research nurse (blinded to diagnosis), and everyone from group 1 was
independently examined by a rheumatologist. Between observer agreement
was assessed among subjects from group 1 by calculating Cohen's
for dichotomous physical signs, and mean differences with limits of
agreement for measured ranges of joint movement. To assess the validity of the examination, a pre-defined algorithm was applied to the nurse's
examination findings in patients from both groups, and the sensitivity
and specificity of the derived diagnoses were determined in comparison
with the clinic's independent diagnosis as the reference standard.
RESULTS
The between
observer repeatability of physical signs varied from good to excellent,
with
coefficients of 0.66 to 1.00 for most categorical
observations, and mean absolute differences of 1.4°-11.9° for
measurements of shoulder movement. The sensitivity of the schedule in
comparison with the reference standard varied between diagnoses from
58%-100%, while the specificities ranged from 84%-100%. The nurse
and the clinic physician generally agreed in their diagnoses, but in
the presence of shoulder capsulitis the nurse usually also diagnosed
shoulder tendinitis, whereas the clinic physician did not.
CONCLUSION
The new
examination protocol is repeatable and gives acceptable diagnostic
accuracy in a hospital setting. Examination can feasibly be delegated
to a trained nurse, and the protocol has the benefit of face and
construct validity as well as consensus backing. Its performance in the
community, where disease is less clear cut, merits separate evaluation,
and further refinement is needed to discriminate between discrete
pathologies at the shoulder.
© 2000 by Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Ainsworth, R., Dziedzic, K., Hiller, L., Daniels, J., Bruton, A., Broadfield, J.
(2008). Comment on: A prospective double blind placebo-controlled randomized trial of ultrasound in the physiotherapy treatment of shoulder pain: reply. Rheumatology (Oxford)
47: 230-231
[Full Text] -
Ryall, C., Coggon, D., Peveler, R., Reading, I., Palmer, K. T
(2007). Pain tolerance in patients presenting to primary care and physiotherapy services with upper limb disorders. Occup. Environ. Med.
64: 349-351
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Ryall, C., Coggon, D., Peveler, R., Poole, J., Palmer, K. T.
(2007). A prospective cohort study of arm pain in primary care and physiotherapy--prognostic determinants. Rheumatology (Oxford)
46: 508-515
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Walker-Bone, K., Reading, I., Coggon, D., Cooper, C., Palmer, K. T.
(2006). Risk factors for specific upper limb disorders as compared with non-specific upper limb pain: assessing the utility of a structured examination schedule. Occup Med (Lond)
56: 243-250
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Ryall, C., Coggon, D., Peveler, R., Reading, I., Palmer, K. T.
(2006). A case-control study of risk factors for arm pain presenting to primary care services. Occup Med (Lond)
56: 137-143
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Walker-Bone, K, Cooper, C
(2005). Hard work never hurt anyone: or did it? A review of occupational associations with soft tissue musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper limb. Ann Rheum Dis
64: 1391-1396
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Lacey, R. J., Lewis, M., Sim, J.
(2005). The relationship between hand paraesthesia and occupational factors: results from a population study. Rheumatology (Oxford)
44: 1287-1293
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Walker-Bone, K, Cooper, C
(2005). Hard work never hurt anyone--or did it? A review of occupational associations with soft tissue musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper limb. Ann Rheum Dis
64: 1112-1117
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Ostor, A. J. K., Richards, C. A., Prevost, A. T., Speed, C. A., Hazleman, B. L.
(2005). Diagnosis and relation to general health of shoulder disorders presenting to primary care. Rheumatology (Oxford)
44: 800-805
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Ostor, A J K, Richards, C A, Prevost, A T, Hazleman, B L, Speed, C A
(2004). Interrater reproducibility of clinical tests for rotator cuff lesions. Ann Rheum Dis
63: 1288-1292
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Hakim, A. J., Cherkas, L. F., Spector, T. D., MacGregor, A. J.
(2003). Genetic associations between frozen shoulder and tennis elbow: a female twin study. Rheumatology (Oxford)
42: 739-742
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Mitchell, S, Reading, I, Walker-Bone, K, Palmer, K, Cooper, C, Coggon, D
(2003). Pain tolerance in upper limb disorders: findings from a community survey. Occup. Environ. Med.
60: 217-221
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Walker-Bone, K, Byng, P, Linaker, C, Reading, I, Coggon, D, Palmer, K T, Cooper, C
(2002). Reliability of the Southampton examination schedule for the diagnosis of upper limb disorders in the general population. Ann Rheum Dis
61: 1103-1106
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Coggon, D., Palmer, K. T., Walker-Bone, K.
(2000). Occupation and upper limb disorders. Rheumatology (Oxford)
39: 1057-1059
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
