Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 1999;58:288-290; doi:10.1136/ard.58.5.288
Copyright © 1999 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism.
Ann Rheum Dis 1999;58:288-290 ( May )

Extended reports

Does sulphasalazine cause drug induced systemic lupus erythematosus? No effect evident in a prospective randomised trial of 200 rheumatoid patients treated with sulphasalazine or auranofin over five years Margaret-Mary Gordon,a Duncan R Porter,b Hilary A Capella

a Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, b Department of Rheumatology, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow

Correspondence to: Corresponence to: Dr M-M Gordon, Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow G4 0SF.

Accepted for publication 26 February 1999

BACKGROUND---Sulphasalazine (SSZ) has been reported to cause drug induced systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but diagnosis of this complication in the context of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is difficult.
OBJECTIVE---To determine prospectively: (1) if patients become seropositive for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) during prolonged treatment with SSZ without clinical evidence of SLE; (2) if ANA positive patients develop more adverse reactions than ANA negative patients; (3) if drug induced SLE was identified in this cohort.
METHODS---200 patients enrolled in a randomised prospective trial of SSZ and auranofin (AUR) were followed up for five years. Baseline and annual ANA results were collected along with information on drug toxicity and reasons for discontinuation of treatment.
RESULTS---Over five years 24 patients stopped taking SSZ and 49 AUR because of side effects. Of the features common to SLE, rash developed in nine SSZ patients and 11 AUR treated patients and mouth ulcers in three and four patients respectively. Six SSZ treated patients and three treated with AUR developed leucopenia, which promptly resolved with drug withdrawal. No adverse event was ascribed to drug induced SLE. Of the 72 SSZ treated patients who were ANA negative or weakly positive at outset, 14 (19%) became strongly ANA positive compared with 11 (14%) of 80 AUR patients. Patients ANA positive at baseline or who became ANA positive were not more likely to develop drug toxicity or to withdraw from treatment than those ANA negative throughout.
CONCLUSION---ANA positivity is common in patients with RA, but the presence or development of ANA did not increase the likelihood of withdrawing from treatment. No case of drug induced SLE was seen over five years in this study.


© 1999 by Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Mongey, A-B., Hess, E. (2007). Importance of drugs and environmental agents in Lupus. Lupus 16: 539-540  
  • Vasoo, S (2006). Drug-induced lupus: an update. Lupus 15: 757-761 [Abstract]  
  • Helenius, L M J, Hietanen, J H, Helenius, I, Kautiainen, H, Piirainen, H, Paimela, L, Lappalainen, M, Suuronen, R, Lindqvist, C, Leirisalo-Repo, M (2001). Focal sialadenitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and spondyloarthropathy: a comparison with patients with rheumatoid arthritis or mixed connective tissue disease. Ann Rheum Dis 60: 744-749 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gunnarsson, I., Nordmark, B., Hassan Bakri, A., Grondal, G., Larsson, P., Forslid, J., Klareskog, L., Ringertz, B. (2000). Development of lupus-related side-effects in patients with early RA during sulphasalazine treatment--the role of IL-10 and HLA. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39: 886-893 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest Rheumatology Jobs

Rheumatology Jobs