Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 1998;57:13-19; doi:10.1136/ard.57.1.13
Copyright © 1998 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism.
Ann Rheum Dis 1998;57:13-19 ( January )

Extended reports

On the course of low back pain in general practice: a one year follow up study Hans J M van den Hoogen,a Bart W Koes,a Jacques Th M van Eijk,a Lex M Bouter,a Walter Devilléa

a The Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, b Faculty of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Correspondence to: Dr H van den Hoogen, EMGO Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Accepted for publication 18 September 1997

OBJECTIVES---Knowledge on the clinical course of low back pain presented in general practice is poor. Preceding studies offer a fragmentary view only, whereas further knowledge is important to enable the assessment of the prognosis. The object of this study is to investigate the course of low back pain presented in general practice to enable the assessment of the prognosis.
METHODS---A one year follow up study on the clinical course of low back pain in consecutive cases receiving usual care in general practice. During a period of two years 15 general practitioners from Amsterdam and surrounding areas included consecutive patients with both chronic and recent onset low back pain. After the initial visit, each patient was monitored for a period of 12 months. The follow up consisted of monthly postal questionnaires on the course of the low back pain and the related disability.
RESULTS---A total of 443 of 605 patients identified were included in the follow up, which was fully completed by 269 patients. In general, patients with less serious low back pain participated less often or did not complete the follow up. At 12 weeks 35% and at the end of the follow up 10% of the population, respectively, still suffered from low back pain. Both the pain and the disability seemed to diminish quickly after the initial visit, and both seemed to stabilise at a lower level if the low back pain did not disappear completely. About three of four patients, whose pain disappeared before the end of the follow up, endured one or more relapses within a year. The median time to a relapse was about seven weeks, and its median duration about six weeks. Both the pain and the disability turned out to be less severe during relapses. The median time to recovery for patients whose low back pain developed more than seven weeks before the initial visit, was four weeks longer than for patients with more recently developed low back pain at the initial visit.
CONCLUSIONS---The clinical course of low back pain presented in general practice, for the most patients, clearly is less favourable than expected. It takes more than just a few weeks to recover, and relapses occur within a year in most cases. Fortunately, both the pain and the disability quickly diminish, even if the low back pain does not resolve within a few weeks.

Keywords: backache; prognosis; follow up study; general practice


© 1998 by Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Low back pain: an intermittent and remittent predicament of life
NORTIN M HADLER and TIMOTHY S CAREY
Ann Rheum Dis 1998 57: 1-2. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Shen, F. H., Samartzis, D., Andersson, G. B.J. (2006). Nonsurgical Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14: 477-487 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Koes, B W, van Tulder, M W, Thomas, S (2006). Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain.. BMJ 332: 1430-1434 [Full Text]  
  • Dunn, K. M., Jordan, K., Croft, P. R. (2006). Characterizing the Course of Low Back Pain: A Latent Class Analysis. Am J Epidemiol 163: 754-761 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Davidson, M., Keating, J. L (2002). A Comparison of Five Low Back Disability Questionnaires: Reliability and Responsiveness. ptjournal 82: 8-24 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wernick, R., Campbell, S. M. (2000). Update in Rheumatology. ANN INTERN MED 132: 125-133 [Full Text]  
  • Thomas, E., Silman, A. J, Croft, P. R, Papageorgiou, A. C, Jayson, M. I V, Macfarlane, G. J (1999). Predicting who develops chronic low back pain in primary care: a prospective study. BMJ 318: 1662-1667 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Haigh, R., Clarke, A. K (1999). Effectiveness of rehabilitation for spinal pain. Clin Rehabil 13: 63-81 [Abstract]  
  • HADLER, N. M, CAREY, T. S (1998). Low back pain: an intermittent and remittent predicament of life. Ann Rheum Dis 57: 1-2 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest Rheumatology Jobs

Rheumatology Jobs