Review
Efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back
pain: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials
a Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine,
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
, b Institute for Rehabilitation Medicine,
Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Correspondence to: Dr B W Koes, Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Accepted for publication 10
January 1997
PURPOSE
To assess the efficacy of non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for low back pain.
DATA SOURCES
Computer aided search of published
randomised clinical trials and assessment of the methods of the studies.
STUDY SELECTION
26 randomised clinical trials
evaluating NSAIDs for low back pain were identified.
DATA EXTRACTION
Score for quality (maximum = 100 points) of the methods based on four categories: study population;
interventions; effect measurement; data presentation and analysis.
Determination of success rate per study group and evaluation of
different contrasts. Statistical pooling of placebo controlled trials
in similar patient groups and using similar outcome measures.
RESULTS
The methods scores of the trials ranged
from 27 to 83 points. NSAIDs were compared with placebo treatment in 10 studies. The pooled odds ratio in four trials comparing NSAIDs with
placebo after one week was 0.53 (95% confidence intervals 0.32 to
0.89) using the fixed effect model, indicating a significant effect in
favour of NSAIDs compared with placebo. In nine studies NSAIDs were
compared with other (drug) therapies. Of these, only two studies
reported better results of NSAIDs compared with paracetamol with and
without dextropropoxyphene. In the other trials NSAIDs were not better
than the reference treatment. In 11 studies different NSAIDs were
compared, of which seven studies reported no differences in effect.
CONCLUSIONS
There are flaws in the design of
most studies. The pooled odds ratio must be interpreted with caution
because the trials at issue, including the high quality trials, did not
use identical outcome measures. The results of the 26 randomised trials
that have been carried out to date, suggest that NSAIDs might be
effective for short-term symptomatic relief in patients with
uncomplicated low back pain, but are less effective or ineffective in
patients with low back pain with sciatica and patients with sciatica
with nerve root symptoms.
© 1997 by Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Chou, R., Huffman, L. H.
(2007). Medications for Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. ANN INTERN MED
147: 505-514
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Shen, F. H., Samartzis, D., Andersson, G. B.J.
(2006). Nonsurgical Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain. J Am Acad Orthop Surg
14: 477-487
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Smith, D., McMurray, N., Disler, P.
(2002). Early intervention for acute back injury: can we finally develop an evidence-based approach?. Clin Rehabil
16: 1-11
[Abstract]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
