Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 1997;56:608-612; doi:10.1136/ard.56.10.608
Copyright © 1997 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism.
Ann Rheum Dis 1997;56:608-612 ( October )

Extended reports

Clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis: methodological suggestions for assessing radiographs arising from the GRISAR* study R Ferrara,a F Priolo,b M Cammisa,c L Bacarini,d A Cerase,b G Pasero,e G F Ferraccioli,f O Della Casa Alberighi,a A Antonellini,a E Marubinig, on behalf of GRISAR

a Novartis Farma, Medical Department, Milan, Italy , b Institute of Radiology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy , c Department of Radiology, S Giovanni Rotondo, Italy , d Department of Radiology, Treviso, Italy , e Chair of Rheumatology, Pisa, Italy , f Rheumatic Disease Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Udine, Italy , g Institute of Medical Statistics and Biometry, Milan, Italy

Correspondence to: R Ferrara, Novartis Farma SpA, Medical Department, SS 233, km 20.5, I-21040 Origgio(VA), Italy.

Accepted for publication 1 July 1997

OBJECTIVES---The three x ray assessors of the GRISAR study (blinded to treatment) gave consensual erosion and damage scores to the baseline and 12 month radiographs of 284 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients using three different methods: single readings (blinded as to patient and chronological sequence of the x rays), paired readings (blinded as to sequence), and chronologically ordered paired readings. The aim was to evaluate which of these reading procedures is the most appropriate for clinical trials.
METHODS---The progression of the scores obtained using each procedure was compared by means of descriptive statistics, principal components analysis, and intra-patient correlation coefficients of pairs of methods. Bootstrap estimates of the variance of the difference in the means of two equally sized random samples were calculated to evaluate the power of the statistical analysis performed to assess the possible treatment effect for both paired and chronological reading methods.
RESULTS---(a)The standard deviations of the paired and chronological readings were similar, but that of the single readings was higher. (b) The knowledge that two x rays were of the same patient accounted for a sizeable proportion of the between method variability. (c) Agreement was satisfactory between the paired and chronological methods for both scores but, between them and the single readings, it was modest for erosions and poor for damage. (d) The bootstrap estimate of the variance of the difference was smaller for the paired than the chronological method, possibly giving it greater power to test treatment effect.
CONCLUSIONS---These results suggested that paired readings were the most suitable for evaluating the progression of joint damage in the GRISAR study.


* Gruppo Reumatologi Italiani Studio Artrite Reumatoide


© 1997 by Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Wanders, A, Landewe, R, Spoorenberg, A, de Vlam, K, Mielants, H, Dougados, M, van der Linden, S, van der Heijde, D (2004). Scoring of radiographic progression in randomised clinical trials in ankylosing spondylitis: a preference for paired reading order. Ann Rheum Dis 63: 1601-1604 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bruynesteyn, K, Landewe, R, van der Linden, S., van der Heijde, D (2004). Radiography as primary outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: acceptable sample sizes for trials with 3 months' follow up. Ann Rheum Dis 63: 1413-1418 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ory, P A (2003). Interpreting radiographic data in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 62: 597-604 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Boini, S, Guillemin, F (2001). Radiographic scoring methods as outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis: properties and advantages. Ann Rheum Dis 60: 817-827 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Auleley, G.-R., Giraudeau, B., Dougados, M., Ravaud, P. (2000). Radiographic assessment of hip osteoarthritis progression: impact of reading procedures for longitudinal studies. Ann Rheum Dis 59: 422-427 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • van der Heijde, D., Boonen, A., Boers, M., Kostense, P., van der Linden, S. (1999). Reading radiographs in chronological order, in pairs or as single films has important implications for the discriminative power of rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Rheumatology (Oxford) 38: 1213-1220 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest Rheumatology Jobs

Rheumatology Jobs