Comparative study of tibial (single) and tibiofemoral (double) osteotomy for osteoarthrosis and rheumatoid arthritis.
Osteotomies on 101 knees in 79 patients were assessed either prospectively or retrospectively. High tibial osteotomy was performed in 54 knees (27 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 27 with osteoarthrosis (OA)) and double (tibiofemoral) osteotomy in 47 knees (25 RA and 22 OA), and were assessed prospectively in 46 and retrospectively in 55. Using a subjective assessment, 65% showed some improvement--70% of the single and 60% of the double osteotomies. Of the four groups (OA single or double, RA single or double), OA knees having a single osteotomy improved most frequently (74%), and OA knees having a double osteotomy least frequently (50%). Significant improvements in pain score and angular deformity were recorded. The mean range of movement of the operated knee was significantly reduced, and was particularly evident in those knees having a double osteotomy. We conclude that double osteotomies tend to have a higher incidence of complications, including impaired movement, and are not more efficient in relieving pain than single osteotomies in either OA or RA.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Babis, G. C., An, K.-N., Chao, E. Y.S., Rand, J. A., Sim, F. H.
(2002). Double Level Osteotomy of the Knee: A Method to Retain Joint-Line Obliquity : Clinical Results. JBJS
84: 1380-1388
[Abstract] [Full Text]
- Full Text (PDF)
- Submit a response
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me when eLetters are posted
- Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
- Email this link to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Add article to my folders
- Download to citation manager
- Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
